green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
These affiants stated that they enjoyed "the wildlife, aesthetics, open space, ecological and other values of the wetlands, ... and [were] directly and beneficially interested in the continued protection, preservation, and enhancement of these values." Id. at 1160-61.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
Id. at 1166 (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Bernard Citizens for Environmental Quality, Inc. v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.
See id. at 73 n. 10.
cited
Cited "see"
Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Chin-Liang Chan
See Peer Int’l Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc., 909 F.2d 1332 , 1335-36 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); 4 M.
cited
Cited "see"
Sand v. Steele
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maine People's Alliance v. Holtrachem Manufacturing Co.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 72 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) (discussing the Clean Water Act the court stated that the “likelihood may be established by showing that a defendant has 1) discharged some pollutant in concentrations greater than allowed by his permit, 2) into a waterway in which the plaintiffs have an interest that is or may be adversely affected by the pollutant, and that 3) this pollutant causes or contributes to the kinds of injuries alleged by t…
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kruse
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , *412 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Hassell v. City of Chesapeake, Virginia
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. den., 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Coles Ex Rel. Estate of Egan v. Jenkins
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Howarth v. Rockingham Pub. Co., Inc.
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Krichbaum v. U.S. Forest Service
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Edmonds v. Gilmore
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. den., 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Stukes v. Aetna Insulated Wire Co.
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. den., 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. Stormont Trice Corp.
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1087 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) cert. den., 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Stars' Desert Inn Hotel & Country Club, Inc. v. Richard Hwang
(2×)
See Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1413 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991). 20 We also have no difficulty concluding that Stars was prejudiced by Hwang's reluctance to be deposed.
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 79 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Unbelievable, Inc.
See, Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1417 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991). 44 The amount of the award for attorneys' fees and double costs incurred on appeal shall be established by a supplemental order upon submissions by the Board, the Union and Frontier, in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 39(d) and Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1. 45 The Board's petition to enforce its order is granted.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Unbelievable, Inc.
See, Adriana Int’l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1417 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. Beardslee
See Adriana Int’l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1411 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Milam v. Regents of the University of California
It should be noted, however, that “the judge’s function is not himself to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter.” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Miller v. Leathers, 885 F.2d 151, 154 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc., Moorgate Ltd., Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc., and Richard Schulze, Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc., and Richard D. Portaro, Jr., Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc., and Moorgate Ltd.
See Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1411 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); cf. Fjelstad, 762 F.2d at 1343 .
cited
Cited "see"
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc.
See Adriana Int’l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406, 1411 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); cf. Fjelstad, 762 F.2d at 1343 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Glazer v. American Ecology Environmental Services Corp.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 75 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); see also United States v. Walsh, 8 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1830 , 128 L.Ed.2d 459 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Peer International Corp. v. Luna Records, Inc.
See Peer Int’l Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc., 909 F.2d 1332 , 1334 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Joseph Sheehan v. Howard Beyer, Superintendent Wilbur Smith, Captain Boyd, Sergeant Pat La Flore, Social Worker
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 76 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); American Medical Imaging Corp. v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Lockhart
See Jones v. Davis, 835 F.2d 835 (11th Cir.1988), aff'd 906 F.2d 552 (1990), cert. denied, [ 498 U.S. 1109 ] 111 S.Ct. 1019 [ 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 ] (1991) (defendant met burden by presenting testimony of six criminal attorneys who testified to having observed a pattern and practice on the part of the prosecutor to use peremptory challenges systematically to strike African-Americans from the jury venire.) Respondent has offered no evidence to refute or rebut petitioner’s claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Lockhart
See, Jones v. Davis, 835 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1988), appeal after remand 906 F.2d 552 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) (defendant met burden by presenting testimony of six criminal attorneys who testified to having observed a pattern and practice on the part of the prosecutor to use peremptory challenges systematically to strike African-Americans from the jury venire.) Respondent has offered no evidence to refute or rebut petitioner’s claim. *1447 Thus, the Court finds that both the conviction and the sentence are invalid and must be set …
cited
Cited "see"
Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6 of the Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International Union
See Public Interest Research Group v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 76 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6
See Public Interest Research Group v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 76 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allain Delont Norman v. Otis Taylor, Deputy Sergeant
(2×)
See Miller v. Leathers, 913 F.2d 1085, 1089 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) (if evidence supports "reliable inference of wantonness," prima facie case is established), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) 5 The alleged threats directed at Norman are relevant to this inquiry as well.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Karg Bros.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, 913 F.2d 64 , 72 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Watkins, 954 F.2d 974 (4th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Waskovich v. Morgano
See Public Interest Research Group v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 76 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Waskovich v. Morgano
See Public Interest Research Group v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 76 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Refining And Marketing, Inc.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 71 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991). 51 Standing analysis focuses on whether a party has a sufficient stake in the controversy.
cited
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 71 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Colonial Tanning Corp.
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, 913 F.2d 64 , 72 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Watkins, 954 F.2d 974 (4th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of California, 813 F.2d 1480 (9th Cir.1987), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988), judgment reinstated and remanded, 853 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1988); United States v. Windward Properties, Inc., 821 F.Supp. 690 (N.D.Ga.1993); Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 806 F.Supp. 1263 (E.D.Va.1992); Atlantic States Legal…
cited
Cited "see"
Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.
See NJPIRG v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, 913 F.2d 64 , 73 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dierschke v. O'Cheskey
See FSLIC v. Kroenke, 858 F.2d 1067 (5th Cir.1988) 17 Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 24.005(a) (Vernon 1987) 18 Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1414 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1019 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) 19 5 Moore's Federal Practice § 38.19 (1992) 20 928 F.2d 679 (5th Cir.1991) (citing Erie Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nalley v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Md.
It should be noted, however, that “the judge’s function *198 is not himself to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter.” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511 ; see Miller v. Leathers, 885 F.2d 151, 154 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jessie Thomas v. United States of America, and Michael Enterprises Division Michael Enterprises Division, D/B/A Salt House Mary Holiday Tom Holiday Mary and Tom Holiday, D/B/A Salt House, Laura Hunt, as Guardian of Jonathan Turner, a Minor Laura Hunt, Individually v. United States of America, and John W. Hagen John W. Hagen, D/B/A Twin Ridge Marina, Laura Hunt, as Guardian of Jonathan Turner, a Minor Laura Hunt, Individually v. United States of America, and John W. Hagen John W. Hagen, D/B/A Twin Ridge Marina
See Zavadil v. United States, 908 F.2d 334 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3564 (U.S. 1991); Fryman v. United States, 901 F.2d 79 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3293 (U.S. 1990); Dewitt Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 878 F.2d 246 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 58 U.S.L.W. 3565 (U.S. 1990); Dawson v. United States, 894 F.2d 70 (3d Cir. 1990); McCarthy v. United States, 850 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1052 (1989); Mocklin v. Orleans Levee Dist., 877 F.2d 427 (5th Cir. 1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Watkins
See Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 72 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991). 7 Instead, to meet the "fairly traceable" requirement of Valley Forge, plaintiffs must merely show that a defendant discharges a pollutant that "causes or contributes to the kinds of injuries alleged by the plaintiffs." Id. at 72.
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Watkins
See Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 72 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991). 7 Instead, to meet the “fairly traceable” requirement of Valley Forge, plaintiffs must merely show that a defendant discharges a pollutant that “causes or contributes to the kinds of injuries alleged by the plaintiffs.” Id. at 72.
cited
Cited "see"
Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rice
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 70-71 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Talarico Bros. Building Corp. v. Union Carbide Corporation
Tex. 1995) (barring claims before notice was given); see also Public Interest Research Group of N.J., Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 75 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Public Interest Research Group v. Atlantic Salmon of Maine, LLC
See, e.g., Public Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 74-75 (3rd Cir.1990) (applying same five-year federal statute of limitations period to citizen suit brought under CWA), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991); Sierra Club v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 834 F.2d 1517, 1521 (9th Cir.1987) (five-year statute of limitations found in 28 U.S.C. § 2462 is the relevant federal limitations period for a citizen suit under CWA); United States v. Reaves, 923 F.Supp. 1530, 1533 (M.D.Fla.1996) (five-year statute of limitations appli…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Municipality of Penn Hills
The statute of limitations governing suits for civil penalties under the Act provides, in pertinent part, that “an action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise,- shall not be entertained unless commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued..:. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2462 ; see also Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc., 913 F.2d 64, 73-74 (3d Cir. 1990) (applying five year limitations period to action brought under the Act), cert. denied, *438 498 U.S. 1109 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 720 F.Supp. 1158, 1161, 1163, 1166 (D.N.J.1989), aff'd in part, rev’d on other grounds, 913 F.2d 64 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho Sporting Congress v. Computrol, Inc.
Application of section 2462 to citizen enforcement suits is in keeping with the language of the statute; a citizen enforcement suit is also an “action ... for the enforcement of [a] civil fine.” Id. at 1521 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2462 ); see also Public Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc., 913 F.2d 64 , 74-75 (3rd Cir.1990) (applying same five-year federal statute of limitations period to citizen suit brought under Clean Water Act), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 , 111 S.Ct. 1018 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bell Atlantic Corp.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.