green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles David Gipp
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1168 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1102 , 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991); United States v. Malin, 908 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 991 , 111 S.Ct. 534 , 112 L.Ed.2d 544 (1990); United States v. Henry, 878 F.2d 937, 944 (6th Cir.1989); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 842 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James E. Lewis
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1170 (8th Cir.1990) (deferring to district court’s finding that defendant was not entitled to reduction for acceptance of responsibility because he testified untruthfully and made lame excuses for his conduct), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman Jackson
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1170 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991) [citing 28 U.S.C. § 991 (b)(1)(B)].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl M. Burnett, Also Known as Earl M. Burnett, Ii, Also Known as Earl M. Burnett, Iii, Also Known as Tad Burnett
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1170 (8th Cir.1990) (defendant not entitled to reduction for acceptance of responsibility when he attempted to justify conduct with “lame excuses”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991); United States v. Evidente, 894 F.2d 1000, 1003 (8th Cir.) (defendant’s guilty plea and belated letter of remorse insufficient to warrant reduction), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 1956 , 109 L.Ed.2d 318 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter Taylor
See, e.g., United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1170-71 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991), and United States v. Evidente, 894 F.2d 1000, 1003-05 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 922 , 110 S.Ct. 1956 , 109 L.Ed.2d 318 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillip Moore
(2×)
See also United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1167 (8th Cir.1990) ("Because the execution of the warrant was carried out by state authorities in this case, we note that a state search must be reasonable under the fourth amendment in order for evidence to be admissible in a federal prosecution."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Starr
v.
District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (Workers Compensation)
v.
District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (Workers Compensation)
No. 90-6601.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
498 U.S. 1102
1991 U.S. LEXIS 1071
Cited by 37 opinions | Published
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.