Singh v. California Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 513 U.S. 1154 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Singh v. California Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 513 U.S. 1154 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
154 citation events (77 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Green v. KHRISNASWAMY (nywd, 2004-07-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Green v. KHRISNASWAMY
W.D.N.Y. · 2004 · confidence medium
The Second Circuit has stated that a medical need is “serious” for constitutional purposes if it presents “ ‘a condition of urgency’ that may result in ‘degeneration’ or ‘extreme pain.’ ” Chance v. Armstrong, 143 F.3d 698, 702 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 *419 (1995)).
cited Cited "see" Powell v. Cusimano
D. Conn. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied sub nom., Foote v. Hathaway, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
cited Cited "see" DiPace v. Goord
S.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994) (“Hathaway I”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. Wright
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994) (“Hathaway /”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995). 1.
cited Cited "see" Rivera v. Goord
S.D.N.Y. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Hallett v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
S.D.N.Y. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Rudnicki v. Southern College of Optometry (In Re Rudnicki)
6th Cir. BAP · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiatt v. Indiana Student Assistance Comm’n (In re Hiatt), 36 F.3d 21, 23 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); Graddy v. United States (In re Graddy), Case No. 98-22821-B, Adv.
discussed Cited "see" Stricklen v. W.D. Ford Direct Consolidation (In Re Stricklen)
Bankr. E.D. Ark. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm’n, 36 F.3d 21 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); United States v. McGrath, 143 B.R. 820 (D.Md.1992), aff'd, 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir.1993); Cobb v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In re Cobb), 196 B.R. 34 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1996); In re Martin, 137 B.R. 770 (Bankr.W.D.Mo. 1992).
discussed Cited "see" Cobb v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In Re Cobb)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm., 36 F.3d 21 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); United States v. McGrath, 143 B.R. 820 (D.Md.1992) aff'd 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir.1993) (table); In re Hesselgrave, 177 B.R. 681 (Bankr.D.Or.1995); In re Menendez, 151 B.R. 972 (Bankr.M.D.Fla. 1993); In re Martin, 137 B.R. 770 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1992); In re Saburah, 136 B.R. 246 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1992).
discussed Cited "see" Santa Fe Medical Services, Inc. v. Segal (In Re Segal)
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm'n, 36 F.3d 21, 25 (7th Cir.1994) (“We conclude that, in cases in which a debtor has consolidated her educational loans pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1078-3 , the plain language of section 523(a)(8)(A) requires that the nondischargeability period commences on the date on which the consolidation loan first became due.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); Martin v. Great Lakes Higher Educ.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Varrone v. Bilotti
2d Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 67 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Varrone v. Bilotti
2d Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 67 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." VMS Ltd. Partnership Securities Litigation v. Prudential Securities Inc.
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the Court in Kokkonen ultimately held that a district court does not have the inherent power to enforce a' settlement agreement when its final order does nothing more than dismiss the suit, the Supreme Court noted that when a lower court reserves its power to enforce a settlement, “a breach of the agreement would be a violation of the order, and ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the agreement would therefore exist.” Id. at 378-82 , 114 S.Ct. at 1676-77 ; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994) (following Kokkonen noting that “if the judgment explicit…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vms Securities Litigation v. Prudential Securities Incorporated
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the Court in Kokkonen ultimately held that a district court does not have the inherent power to enforce a settlement agreement when its final order does nothing more than dismiss the suit, the Supreme Court noted that when a lower court reserves its power to enforce a settlement, "a breach of the agreement would be a violation of the order, and ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the agreement would therefore exist." Id. at 378-82 , 114 S.Ct. at 1676-77 ; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994) (following Kokkonen noting that "if the judgment explicitly inco…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quest Medical, Inc. v. Apprill
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Keener v. Exxon Co., USA, 32 F.3d 127, 132 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); United States v. Campbell, 897 F.2d 1317, 1322 (5th Cir.1990); Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enters., 793 F.2d 1456, 1461 (5th Cir.1986), certs. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 1089, 107 S.Ct. 884 , 1089, 93 L.Ed.2d 837 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Beckless v. Chater
N.D. Ill. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 1677; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. - 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jolly v. Coughlin
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Farmer makes it clear that prison officials do not have to act with the “very purpose of causing harm....” - U.S. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 1977 ; see also Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63 , 66 (2d Cir.1994) ("Deliberate indifference requires more than negligence, but less than conduct undertaken for the very purpose of causing harm.") (citing Farmer, — U.S. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 1978 ), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1108 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995). 13 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Singh
v.
California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
No. 94-1152.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
513 U.S. 1154
Published

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certio-rari denied.