green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
James R. King v. Illinois State Board of Elections, David E. Murray, Lawrence E. Johnson v. Bobby Rush, Timuel Black, Al Johnson, Intervening
See King v. State Bd. of Elections (“King 7”), 979 F.Supp. 582 (N.D.Ill.), vacated, King v. Illinois Bd. of Elections, 519 U.S. 978 , 117 S.Ct. 429 , 136 L.Ed.2d 328 (1996). 4 Mr. King appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of its decisions in Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 , 116 S.Ct. 1894 , 135 L.Ed.2d 207 (1996), and Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 , 116 S.Ct. 1941 , 135 L.Ed.2d 248 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Utilities Board v. F.C.C.
Iowa Utilities Bd. v. FCC, 109 F.3d 418 (8th Cir.), motion to vacate stay denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 429 , 136 L.Ed.2d 328 (1996); see id. at 423 (explaining "pick and choose" rule in greater detail). 22 In their main briefs and oral arguments, the petitioners now renew and refine their attacks against the Agency's pricing rules, and they also widen the scope of their challenge to the First Report and Order and assail additional FCC rules, particularly the agency's non-price regulations pertaining to the incumbent LECs' unbundling obligations.
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission
Iowa Utilities Bd. v. FCC, 109 F.3d 418 (8th Cir.), motion to vacate stay denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 429 , 136 L.Ed.2d 328 (1996); see id. at 423 (explaining “pick and choose” rule in greater detail).
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. Silver
See King v. Illinois Bd. of Elections, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 429 , 136 L.Ed.2d 328 (1996), *130 vacating and remanding King v. State Bd. of Elections, 979 F.Supp. 582 (N.D.Ill.1996). 24 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Communications Commission
v.
Iowa Utilities Board
v.
Iowa Utilities Board
No. A-299.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1996.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Application to-vacate the stay-issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, addressed to Justice Ginsburg and referred to the Court, denied.