green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Richey v. Tyson
But see, e.g., Clifton v. Federal Election Commission, 114 F.3d 1309, 1312 (1st Cir.1997)(noting that Supreme Court cases hint at permissible election finance restrictions adversely affecting issue advocacy), *1310 cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1108 , 118 S.Ct. 1036 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
See Smith v. Horn, 120 F.3d 400, 408 (3d Cir.1997) (inappropriate to raise procedural default sua sponte where the record is well developed and the merits strongly support the petitioner’s claim), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998); Brewer v. Marshall, 119 F.3d 993, 999 (1st Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1172 , 140 L.Ed.2d 182 (1998); Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir.1995); Esslinger v. Davis, 44 F.3d 1515, 1524 (11th Cir.1995); Ortiz v. Dubois, 19 F.3d 708, 715 (1st Cir.1994) (“Where ____the state procedural default is clear o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Wayne Magouirk v. Michael Phillips, Warden, Winn Correctional Center and Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana
(2×)
See Smith v. Horn, 120 F.3d 400, 408-09 (3d Cir.1997) (distinguishing between sua sponte invocation of nonexhaustion and procedural default), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffy v. County of Bucks
S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); see Davidson, 752 F.2d at 823-24 . “ ‘[E]rrors of state law cannot be repackaged as federal errors simply by citing the Due Process Clause.’ ” Smith v. Horn, 120 F.3d 400, 414 (3d Cir.1997) (quoting Johnson v. Rosemeyer, 117 F.3d 104, 109 (3d Cir.1997)), cert. denied sub nom., District Attorney of Bucks County v. Smith, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffy v. County of Bucks
See Reich v. Beharry, 883 F.2d 239, 242 (3d Cir.1989). "`Violation of local law does not necessarily mean that federal rights have been invaded.'" Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 699 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); see Davidson, 752 F.2d at 823-24 . "`[E]rrors of state law cannot be repackaged as federal errors simply by citing the Due Process Clause.'" Smith v. Horn, 120 F.3d 400, 414 (3d Cir.1997) (quoting Johnson v. Rosemeyer, 117 F.3d 104, 109 (3d Cir.1997)), cert. denied sub nom., District Attorney of Bucks County v. Smith, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Short
v.
City of West Point
v.
City of West Point
No. 97-824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.