green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffrey McKinley v. City of Mansfield
(2×)
See Chan v. Wodnicki, 123 F.3d 1005, 1008-10 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1117 , 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998) (holding that a police department’s after-the-fact transfer of an officer who invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege before a grand jury did not amount to the type of compulsion that is prohibited under Garrity and similar cases); Singer v. State of Maine, 49 F.3d 837, 845-47 (1st Cir.1995) (holding that a state tax bureau’s after-the-fact dismissal of an employee who refused to answer possibly incriminating questions was not a violation of a clearly established…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Southeastern Refractories, Inc.
See Canfield v. Van Atta Buick/GMC Truck, 127 F.3d 248, 250 (2d Cir.1997)(suggesting that neglect may be excusable where the language of a rule is ambiguous or susceptible to multiple interpretations, or where an apparent conflict exists between two rules), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1117 , 118 S.Ct. 1055 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Gerald Hickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Heyliger v. State Univ. & Community College Sys. of Tenn., 126 F.3d 849, 851 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Churchill v. Star Enterprises
See Heyliger v. State Univ. and Community College Sys. of Tenn., 126 F.3d 849 , 855 n. 2 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998); Herrmann v. Cencom Cable Assocs., Inc., 999 F.2d 223, 225 (7th Cir.1993); and Woods v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 972 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Creech v. Nguyen
See 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (b). 19 part on other grounds, 66 U.S.L.W. 3474 (U.S. June 22, 1998) (No. 97-1113).
cited
Cited "see"
Churchill v. Star Enterprises
See Heyliger v. State Univ. and Community College Sys. of Tenn., 126 F.3d 849 , 855 n. 2 (6th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walfredo Arreaga-Rodriguez
See United States v. Nash, 115 F.3d 1431, 1440 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 117 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. Williams
See Wingfield v. Massie, 122 F.3d 1329, 1332 (10th Cir.1997) (noting that on habeas review, we must " 'accept the jury's resolution of the evidence as long as it within the bounds of reason' ") (quoting Grubbs v. Hannigan, 982 F.2d 1483, 1487 (10th Cir.1993)), pet. for cert. filed, 66 U.S.L.W. 3474 (Jan. 8, 1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
J-16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELLIS E. NEDER, JR
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Heyliger
v.
State University and Community College System of Tennessee
v.
State University and Community College System of Tennessee
No. 97-1106.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.