Grady v. United States, 525 U.S. 962 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Grady v. United States, 525 U.S. 962 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“adventure resources ii”
43 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re ACE Elevator Co., Inc. (nysb, 2006-06-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re ACE Elevator Co., Inc.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
adventure resources ii
cited Cited "see" United States v. Denise Marie Henderson
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Access Telecommunications v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 137 F.3d 605, 608 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 404 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Denise M. Henderson
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Access Telecommunications v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 137 F.3d 605 , 608 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Benigno Munoz v. Oceanside Resorts, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 135 F.3d 1428, 1432 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998) (applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to an ADEA claim).
cited Cited "see" Benigno Munoz v. Oceanside Resorts, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 135 F.3d 1428, 1432 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S. Ct. 405 (1998) (applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to an ADEA claim).
cited Cited "see" In Re Family Snacks Inc.
Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adventure Resources v. Holland, 137 F.3d 786 , 798 (4th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 404 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998); In re Lady H.
cited Cited "see" Great Plains Coop v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Access Telecommunications v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 137 F.3d 605, 608 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 404 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Insurance v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague-Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F.Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 *427 A.M.C. …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Ins Co v. Orient Overseas
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague- Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F. Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 A.M.C. 505 , 515 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Ins Co v. Orient Overseas
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague- Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F. Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 A.M.C. 505 , 515 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.
unknown court · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague-Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F.Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 A.M.C. 505 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Erick Campos
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 264 F.3d 640, 648 (6th Cir. 2001) (where the defendant’s intent to facilitate drug trafficking was an element of the offense of conviction, and the jury found the existence of that element beyond a reasonable doubt when convicting him, the district court was foreclosed from concluding at sentencing that he did not intend to facilitate drug trafficking), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 (2002).
Grady
v.
United States
No. 98-158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1998.
525 U.S. 962
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.