green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sargent v. Comm'r of Revenue
See Jefferson v. Comm'r of Revenue , 631 N.W.2d 391 , 395 (Minn. 2001) ("It is the sovereign right and ordinary prerogative of a state to tax the income of every resident...." (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted) ), cert. denied , 535 U.S. 930 , 122 S.Ct. 1304 , 152 L.Ed.2d 215 (2002) ; Reed , 253 N.W. at 104, 108 ("It is elementary that the power of taxation is inherent in sovereignty and that under our system of government it reposes in the Legislature, except as it is *410 limited by the state or the national Constitution." (emphasis added) ). 1 CONCLUSION For the foregoing…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brunson v. Pierce County
See To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collins, 144 Wash.2d 403, 416 , 27 P.3d 1149 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 931 , 122 S.Ct. 1304 , 152 L.Ed.2d 215 (2002). [5] Interestingly, Brunson, Johnson, and Tucker do not address the Mathews test, the three-part test that the United States Supreme Court and our Supreme Court use to examine the minimum constitutional process due in a variety of procedural situations.
cited
Cited "see"
Ball v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSING
See To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collins, 144 Wash.2d 403, 410 , 27 P.3d 1149 (2001), cert. denied, ___ U.S.___, 122 S.Ct. 1304 , 152 L.Ed.2d 215 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Molnar
v.
Regents of the University of California
v.
Regents of the University of California
01-1039.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
Published
MOLNAR
v.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
No. 01-1039.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
1
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.