Aria v. United States, on Its Own Behalf & for the Benefit of the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, 537 U.S. 1088 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Aria v. United States, on Its Own Behalf & for the Benefit of the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, 537 U.S. 1088 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
76 citation events (76 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re J.L. (kanctapp, 2019-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" In re J.L.
Kan. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winston v. Kansas Dept. of SRS, 274 Kan. 396, 409 , 49 P.3d 1274 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 1088 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" In re Tangoe, Inc. (2×)
D. Conn. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See York v. Ass'n of the Bar of the City of New York , 286 F.3d 122 , 125 (2d Cir.), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Boyd v. Arnone
D. Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See York v. Ass’n of Bar of City of New York, 286 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Kingsborough v. Sprint Communications Co., Lp (2×)
D. Mass. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Byrne, 291 F.3d 1056, 1060 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1088 , 123 S.Ct. 700 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (“The federal district courts’ jurisdiction over actions concerning real property is generally coterminous with the states’ political boundaries.”); Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co., 239 F.3d 440, 449-450 (2d Cir.2000) (“Under the local action doctrine, courts may not exercise jurisdiction over any ‘local’ action involving real property unless the property at issue is found within the territorial boundaries of the state where the court is sitting.”); In re School …
cited Cited "see" Stanley v. Muzio
D. Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See York v. Association of Bar of City of New York, 286 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roe v. Hotchkiss Sch.
D. Conn. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Trading Corp. , 711 F.3d 353 , 359 (2d Cir. 2013) ; see also York v. Ass'n of the Bar of N.Y.C. , 286 F.3d 122 , 125 (2d Cir. 2002) ("On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accepting the complaint's allegations as true"), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mujo v. Jani-King Int'l, Inc.
D. Conn. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Trading Corp. , 711 F.3d 353 , 359 (2d Cir. 2013) ; see also York v. Ass'n of the Bar of the City of New York , 286 F.3d 122 , 125 (2d Cir. 2002) ("On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accepting the complaint's allegations as true."), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hurlburt v. Mass. Homeland Ins. Co.
D. Conn. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Trading Corp. , 711 F.3d 353 , 359 (2d Cir. 2013) ; see also York v. Ass'n of the Bar of the City of New York , 286 F.3d 122 , 125 (2d Cir. 2002) ("On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accepting the complaint's allegations as true."), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alexander v. Allianz Dresdner Asset Mgmt. of Amer. Holding, Inc.
D. Conn. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ., 526 U.S. 629, 654 , 119 S.Ct. 1661 , 143 L.Ed.2d 839 (1999). “ ‘The issue is not whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail but whether the claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims.’ ” York v. Ass’n of the Bar, 286 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Scheuer, 416 U.S. at 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 ), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1089 , 123 S.Ct. 702 , 154 L.Ed.2d 633 (2002).
Aria
v.
United States, on Its Own Behalf and for the Benefit of the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe
02-604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 2002.
537 U.S. 1088
Published

537 U.S. 1088

ARIA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES, ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE.

No. 02-604.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 16, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 291 F. 3d 1056.