Hahn v. United States, 177 L. Ed. 2d 326 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Hahn v. United States, 177 L. Ed. 2d 326 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes”
64 citation events (64 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Patel (connappct, 2019-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John Jordy v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
S.Ct. 3411, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010); Hayden v. State, 296 S.W.3d 549, 554 (Tex.Crim.App.2009) (holding that even though State opened the door, trial court acted within its discretion to exclude rebuttal evidence under rule 403); Carroll v. State, 02-11-00265-CR, 2013 WL 2435560 , at *3 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth June 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Thurman (3×)
W.D. Ky. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Johnson, 581 F.3d 320, 323-28 (6th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 3409 , 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010) (discussing Crawford).
discussed Cited "see" Bryan Earl Tilford v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Penry v. State , 903 S.W.2d 715, 751 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995); Flores , 299 S.W.3d at 857 ; see Williams v. State , 301 S.W.3d 675, 690-93 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009), cert. denied , --- U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 3411 , 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010)(finding that photographs had probative value because they depicted victim’s injuries).
discussed Cited "see" Bryan Earl Tilford v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Penry v. State, 903 S.W.2d 715, 751 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995); Flores, 299 S.W.3d at 857 ; see Williams v. State, 301 S.W.3d 675, 690-93 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 3411 , 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010)(finding that photographs had probative value because they depicted victim’s injuries).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mitchell
Kan. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Our Supreme Court has noted, however, that "[o]ne error is insufficient to support reversal under the cumulative effect rule. [Citation omitted.]" State v. Cofield, 288 Kan. 367, 378 , 203 P.3d 1261 (2009); see also State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1156-57 , 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3410 , 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010) (refusing to apply cumulative error doctrine when a deadlocked jury instruction was the only trial error).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kris Alan Hahn
v.
United States
No. 09-1382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 326
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.