CSX Transp., Inc. v. Alabama Dep't of Revenue, 177 L. Ed. 2d 323 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Alabama Dep't of Revenue, 177 L. Ed. 2d 323 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes”
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Patel (connappct, 2019-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cater v. New York
S.D. Ill. · 2018 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level....
cited Cited "see" Reville v. Reville
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arar v. Ash- croft, 585 F.3d 559 , 581 n.14 (2d Cir. 2009) (‘‘[d]issents by their nature express views that are not the law’’), cert. denied, 560 U.S. 978 , 130 S. Ct. 3409 , 177 L.
examined Cited "see" United States v. Thurman (3×)
W.D. Ky. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Johnson, 581 F.3d 320, 323-28 (6th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 3409 , 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010) (discussing Crawford).
discussed Cited "see" Richard A. Childress, Jr. v. State of Indiana
Ind. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pendergrass v. State, 913 N.E.2d 703, 706 (Ind. 2009) (discussing what constitutes testimonial evidence, including in-court testimony, formalized materials such as affidavits, and statements which would lead an objective witness to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial) (citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 51 (2004)), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3409 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." KORTLANDER v. Cornell
D. Mont. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Wilkie v. Robbins, 551 U.S. 537, 549-50 , 127 S.Ct. 2588 , 168 L.Ed.2d 389 (2007); see also Arar v. Ashcroft, 585 F.3d 559, 571-72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3409 , 177 L.Ed.2d 349 (2010)(listing instances where the Supreme Court has refused to extend Bivens and declining to create Fifth Amendment substantive due process Bivens action for persons subject to extraordinary rendition); see also Daniel L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CSX Transportation, Inc.
v.
Alabama Department of Revenue
No. 09-520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 323
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1) · S.D. Illinois (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted limited to the following question: “Whether a State’s exemptions of rail carrier competitors, but not rail carriers, from generally applicable sales and use taxes on fuel subject the taxes to challenge under 49 U.S.C. § 11501(b)(4) as ‘another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier.’ ”

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 318.