green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Swichkow v. United States
See United States v. Wetherald, 636 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1002 , 181 L.Ed.2d 744 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Transportation Services, inc. v. Miami-Dade County
See Locke v. Shore, 634 F.3d 1185, 1193-95 (11th Cir.2011) (upholding Florida interior designer licensing requirement because statute did “not block entry altogether” and only required designers “to achieve proficiency”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1004 , 181 L.Ed.2d 734 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryan v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
See Johnson v. Whitehead, 647 F.3d 120, 125 (4th Cir. 2011) cert. denied, - U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1005 , 181 L.Ed.2d 734 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jermaine Mobley
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Boyce, 633 F.3d 708 (8th Cir. 2011) (hold- ing that possession of a homemade weapon in prison prohibited by a state statute is a violent felony under the A.C.C.A.), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1002 (2012); United States v. Zuniga, 553 F.3d 1330 (10th Cir. 2009) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shepherd v. Holder
See Ali v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 478, 488-89 (2d Cir.2008); see also Johnson v. Whitehead, 647 F.3d 120, 129-31 (4th Cir.2011) (reviewing collateral estoppel ruling in criminal-alien-removal action subject to § 1252(a)(2)(C) bar, though not explicitly invoking § 1252(a)(2)(D)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1005 , 181 L.Ed.2d 734 (2012); Duvall v. Att’y Gen., 436 F.3d 382, 386 (3d Cir.2006) (same). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States Steel Corporation
v.
Brian K. Milward, et ux.
v.
Brian K. Milward, et ux.
No. 11-316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2012.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Same case below, 639 F.3d 11.