Edwards v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 356 U.S. 930 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Edwards v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 356 U.S. 930 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Morrone (paed, 1980-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Morrone
E.D. Pa. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
At most, it is “merely a part of the general conduct of the trial, over which the judge’s powers are discretionary like his control over cross-examination, or his comments on the evidence.” United States v. Becker, 2 Cir. 1933, 62 F.2d 1007, 1009 ; accord, Lyles v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 249 F.2d 744, 746 , cert. denied, 1958, 356 U.S. 931 , 78 S.Ct. 773 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 .
discussed Cited "see" Stirling v. Chemical Bank
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Edwards v. Doctors Hospital Inc., 242 F.2d 888, 891 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct. 770 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958). 1 Here, however, the filing of the notice of appeal within 60 days, coupled with a prima facie showing of excusable neglect, and the timely service of the notice of appeal on the opposing parties, constituted a sufficient manifestation on the part of the appellants to permit the district court, in the exercise of its discretion, to treat the notice of appeal as the substantial equivalent of a motion to extend the time because of excusable neglect.
discussed Cited "see" David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent, David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Union Planters National Bank of Memphis
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Edwards v. Doctors Hospital Inc., 242 F.2d 888, 891 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct. 770 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958). 1 Here, however, the filing of the notice of appeal within 60 days, coupled with a prima facie showing of excusable neglect, and the timely service of the notice of appeal on the opposing parties, constituted a sufficient manifestation on the part of the appellants to permit the district court, in the exercise of its discretion, to treat the notice of appeal as the substantial equivalent of a motion to extend the time because of excusable neglect.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Odis Warren Nolte
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: accord · confidence high
At most, it is “merely a part of the general conduct of the trial, over which the judge’s powers are discretionary, like his control over cross-examination, or his comments on the evidence.” United States v. Becker, 2 Cir. 1933, 62 F.2d 1007, 1009 ; accord, Lyles v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 249 F.2d 744, 746 , cert. denied, 1958, 356 U.S. 931 , 78 S.Ct. 773 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edwards
v.
Doctors Hospital, Inc.
No. 219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1958.
356 U.S. 930
Irving Lemov for petitioner., Oscar A. Thompson and Patrick E. Gibbons for Doctors Hospital, Inc., respondent.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.