United States v. Diamond, 356 U.S. 257 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Diamond, 356 U.S. 257 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc. (ca10, 1976-11-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Downs v. Benatar’s Cut Rate Drug Store, 75 Cal.App.2d 61 , 170 P.2d 88 (1st Dist., 1946), and United States v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., 150 F.Supp. 202 (D.Mass.1957), certified, 252 F.2d 420 (1st Cir.), dismissed, 356 U.S. 925 , 78 S.Ct. 712 , 2 L.Ed.2d 757 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
DIAMOND, alias DUMANUS, THORNSON and SLATER
No. 771.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1958.
356 U.S. 257
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1265
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and /. F. Bishop for the United States., Robert L. Brock for David Diamond, respondent.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.