discussed Cited as authority (rule) Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Gill See Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Nadler, 445 N.W.2d 358 , 361 n. 3 (Iowa 1989) (vagueness challenge to EC 9-6); Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Durham, 279 N.W.2d 280, 283-84 (Iowa 1979) (vagueness challenge to EC 1-5, EC 9-6, and DR 1-102(A)(6); Behnke, 276 N.W.2d at 843 , appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. at 805, 100 S.Ct. at 27, 62 L.Ed.2d at 19 (vagueness challenge to former version of EC 5-5).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Getscher See, e.g., Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct v. Behnke, 276 N.W.2d 838, 840 (Iowa), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 805 , 100 S.Ct. 27 , 62 L.Ed.2d 19 (1979).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Iowa Industrial Commissioner v. Davis See also Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct v. Behnke, 276 N.W.2d 838, 843 (Iowa), appeal dismissed,-U.S.-, 100 S.Ct.27, 62 L.Ed.2d 19 (1979).