green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
15.5 score
G Cite
cited 8× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
⚠ not in text
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1982 ·
…better practice is that where parties are aggrieved, the amounts to be paid and the manner of payment should be recited in the order, rather than delegating these details to the probation officer
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Engin Kamil Yesil and Yalie Golan, United States of America v. Glenn Gert Deppe, A/K/A \Vern\" Lnu"
(4×)
a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Engin Kamil Yesil and Yalie Golan, United States of America v. Glenn Gert Deppe, A/K/A \Vern\" Lnu"
(4×)
a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Burgess
(2×)
the scope of permissible impeachment of a witness in a criminal trial generally is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dougherty v. White
(2×)
better practice is that where parties are aggrieved, the amounts to be paid and the manner of payment should be recited in the order, rather than delegating these details to the probation officer
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dougherty v. White
(2×)
better practice is that where parties are aggrieved, the amounts to be paid and the manner of payment should be recited in the order, rather than delegating these details to the probation officer
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jack Randall MacCloskey
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
evidence of mere presence or association is insufficient to support a conviction for conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lois Anderson v. United States
(2×)
See Deutsch v. Commissioner, 599 F.2d 44 (2nd Cir.1979) (holding that where the exception of section 7502 is not literally applicable, courts have consistently rejected testimony or other evidence as proof of the actual date of mailing), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Miller v. United States, 784 F.2d 728 (6th Cir.1986) (same); Surowka v. United States, 909 F.2d 148 (6th Cir.1990) (same). *491 We do not read Shipley so broadly.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristion
(2×)
See United States v. Runck, 601 F.2d 968, 969-70 (8th Cir.1979) (during sentencing judge added condition of restitution, a term outside the bounds of plea agreement), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Welch v. State
See United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); United States v. Lanier, 578 F.2d 1246 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 856 , 99 S.Ct. 169 , 58 L.Ed.2d 163 (1978); United States v. Zuniga-Lara, 570 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 961 , 98 S.Ct. 3080 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1128 (1978); Volusia County Bank v. Bigelow, 45 Fla. 638 , 33 So. 704 (1903); Hines v. State, 425 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 430 So.2d 452 (Fla.1983); McElveen v. State, 415 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Sims v. State, 184 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Harry Reeh, Arlington Douglas Sprecher, Theodore Duaine Jorden and Gary Michael Ryan
(2×)
We agree with the first and fourth circuits that consent from the flag state "constitute[s] just such a 'special arrangement.' " United States v. Green, 671 F.2d 46, 51 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2962 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1352 (1982); accord United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Esteban Marino-Garcia and Omar Chaverra, Hernan Ardila-Boyona, William G. Suarez, Valentin Torres-Camargo, Ernesto Segundo Torres-Riasco, Evelio Pauth-Arzuza, Fabian Perdoma-Cardona, Ramon Elias Reales-Morales, United States of America v. Pablo Emilio Cassalins-Guzman, Casimiro Diaz-Castillo, Carlos Espana, Alfredo Pupo-Bolano, David Rene Olaya-Betancur, Nemecia Hidalgo-Castillo, Jaime Pimienta-Perez, and Luis Estanislao Perea-Ulloa
Accord, United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980) (concluding that stateless vessels have "no rights under international law."); see also United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397, 403 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Cortes, supra, 588 F.2d at 110 . 16 Furthermore, commentators discussing the issue have unanimously agreed that all nations have the right to assert jurisdiction over stateless vessels on the high seas. 9 M.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marino-Garcia
Accord, United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980) (concluding that stateless vessels have “no rights under international law.”); see also United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397, 403 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Cortes, supra, 588 F.2d at 110 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Green
See United Slates v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); United States v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1063, 1075, 1090 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc); id., at 1092 (Roney, J., specially concurring); Riesenfeld, supra, at 903 n.56; Coast Guard Authority, supra, at 328 (“As long as the flag state consents expressly to Coast Guard searches of its vessels, . . . [subsequent] seizures do not violate article 6, because the rule of noninterference is not breached when the foreign flag state vessel receives permission from the state wh…
discussed
Cited "see"
Harman Mining Corporation, a Corporation v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, Secretary of Labor
(2×)
See Marshall v. Stoudt’s Ferry Preparation Co., 602 F.2d 589 (3 Cir. 1979), cert. denied 44 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrus v. P-Burg Coal Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Marshall v. Stoudt’s Ferry Preparation Co., 602 F.2d 589 , (3 Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Marshall v. Nolichuckey Sand Co., Inc., 606 F.2d 693 (6 Cir. 1979), cert. den. -U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1835 , 64 L.Ed.2d 261 ; Marshall v. Sink, 614 F.2d 37 , 48 L.W. 2541 (4 Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gene L. Moretti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See also Deutsch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 599 F.2d 44, 45 (2d Cir.1979) (“[T]he Tax Court cannot assert jurisdiction unless a petition is filed within ninety days after a deficiency notice has been mailed by the Commissioner.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deutsch
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 79-635.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1015
Cited by 92 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.