green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…iven the quantity of drugs which were shown to have been moving in and out of webster's possession, the jury would have been justified in concluding that he had received tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars from his drug business.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hall American Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Dick
But see United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 234 (2d Cir.) (“appellants made several interstate telephone calls to and from New York in their quest for explosive devices needed for their activities____), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 [, 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 ] (1981).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Charles Leroy Timberlake and Mitchell Skiff Engelhart v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981) (finding that 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d) and 18 U.S.C. § 371 constitute separate offenses because section 371 requires proof of an overt act and section 1962(d) does not).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
De Falco v. Bernas
in determining what connections with interstate commerce must be proven... to establish a violation of 1962, the courts have ruled that the impact need not be great. so long as the activities of the enterprise affect interstate commerce, the jurisdictional element is satisfied.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sylvester Tolliver, Gerald Elwood, Danielle Bernard Metz, Gennero Arthur, Noah Moore, Jr., Marlo Helmstetter, Glenn Metz, and Shane Sterling, United States of America v. Noah Moore, Jr.
iven the quantity of drugs which were shown to have been moving in and out of webster's possession, the jury would have been justified in concluding that he had received tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars from his drug business.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Moore
iven the quantity of drugs which were shown to have been moving in and out of webster's possession, the jury would have been justified in concluding that he had received tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars from his drug business.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Tolliver
iven the quantity of drugs which were shown to have been moving in and out of webster's possession, the jury would have been justified in concluding that he had received tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars from his drug business.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario Salinas
(2×)
Id. at 495 & 498; see United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 237-38 (2d Cir.1981) ("It is the purpose of this Act to seek the eradication of organized crime in the United States ... by establishing new penal prohibitions, and by providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies to deal with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized crimes.") (quoting The Statement of Findings of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 923 ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marmolejo
(2×)
Id. at 495 & 498; see United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 237-38 (2d Cir.1981) (“It is the purpose of this Act to seek the eradication of organized crime in the United States ... by establishing new penal prohibitions, and by providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies to deal with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized crimes.”) (quoting The Statement of Findings of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 923 ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Medina v. Michelle K. Loveless, and James W. Loveless
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 180 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 (1981); United States v. Canty, 422 F.2d 358, 360 (4th Cir.1970) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 987 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities Litigation
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 237 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981) (holding RICO requires proof of an “agreement” to perform at least two predicate acts.); Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 897 F.2d 21, 25 (2d Cir. 1990) (holding “[b]ecause the core of a RICO civil conspiracy is an agreement to commit predicate acts, a RICO civil conspiracy complaint, at the very least, must allege specifically such an agreement.”). 61 Therefore, the Anchor Defendants Global Motion III, dismissing RICO claims as alleged against them, is gr…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 241 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 241 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone L. Harris, A/K/A Lawrence Harris Tyrone
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 181-82 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Christian v. United States, 454 U.S. 857 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Bautista, United States of America v. Roberto Orama, A/K/A Roberto Vargas, United States of America v. Pedro Silverio, United States of America v. Jose Ferreira
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174 , 182 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 180 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ancel James Holland, A/K/A Tucky, A/K/A Tuckie, A/K/A Shorty
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 (1981), modified on other grounds, 669 F.2d 185 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 935 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Irby v. United States
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 239-40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1129 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); United States v. Gallo, 668 F.Supp. 736, 748 (E.D.N.Y.1987), mandamus granted on other grounds, 834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir.1987); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396-97 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 239-40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1129 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); United States v. Gallo, 668 F.Supp. 736, 748 (E.D.N.Y.1987), mandamus granted on other grounds, 834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir.1987); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396-97 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Valenzuela
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 178 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 (1981), modified on other grounds, 669 F.2d 185 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 935 (1982) (where facts of affidavit indicate activity over protracted period, lapse of time from date of earlier facts is not necessarily an indication of stale probable cause).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Covington, 459 A.2d 1067 , 1070-71 *851 (D.C.1983) (quoting United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981)); Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1043 (D.C.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); Byrd v. United States, 388 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. United States
(2×)
In considering a claim of evidentiary insufficiency, “we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, recognizing the factfinder’s role in weighing the evidence, determining the credibility of witnesses, and drawing justifiable inferences from the evidence.” Ford I, supra, 498 A.2d at 1137 ; accord, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); Byrd v. United States, 388 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1978); Crawford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 375 F.2d 332 (1967); Curley …
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Kelly
Accord United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 238 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of New York v. Joseph L. Balkan, Inc.
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 233-34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc. v. Noto, 548 F.Supp. 352, 354 (E.D.N.Y.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virden v. Graphics One
A minimum effect on interstate commerce satisfies this jurisdiction element.” United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); see United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 573 (9th Cir.1979) (“The government must show a nexus of the enterprise to interstate or foreign commerce, albeit minimal, to satisfy the requirement.”) (emphasis added), cert. denied sub nom., 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980); accord United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 237 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominick Martino
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 , 239 n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. Deaton, 381 F.2d 114, 117 (2d Cir.1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Easley v. United States
Accord United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) (constructive possession of narcotics), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald P. McManigal
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 233-234 (2d Cir.1981), certiorari denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 ; United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836, 850-851 (7th Cir.1977), certiorari denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 . 3 The conviction is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Covington
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1336-37 (D.C.) (double jeopardy clause does not prevent the government from appealing the post-verdict entry of a judgment of acquittal nor preclude appellate review), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); accord United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 130 , 101 S.Ct. 426, 433 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980); United States v. Singleton, 702 F.2d 1159 (D.C.Cir.1983). *1069 Appellee Covington’s separate appeal of his conviction for reckless driving was consolidated with this proceeding by order of this court dated March 23,…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell
See United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 231-32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981) (approving a jury instruction that “[a] building is used ... in an activity [ajffecting interstate commerce ... if oil or gas moving in interstate commerce is used to heat the building.”); United States v. Zabic, No. 82 CR 423, slip op. at 3 (N.D.Ill.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morris
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334 (D.C.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. *54 308, 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); State v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638 , 288 N.W.2d 754 (1980); Peters v. State, 521 S.W.2d 233 (Tenn.Cr.App.1975); State v. Cleppe, 96 Wash.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981); State v. Boyer, 91 Wash.2d 342 , 588 P.2d 1151 (1979); State v. Hartzog, 26 Wash.App. 576 , 615 P.2d 480 (1980); State v. Sainz, 23 Wash.App. 532 , 596 P.2d 1090 (1979); State v. Edwards, 9 Wash.App. 688 , 514 P.2d 192 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rucker v. United States
See United States v. Hubbard, D.C.App., 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); United States v. Staten, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 105 , 581 F.2d 878, 883 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Suquet
See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 182 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1367-68 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Cravero, 545 F.2d 406, 410-11 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100 , 97 S.Ct. 1123 , 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977); United States v. Kirk, 534 F.2d 1262, 1277-78 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1174 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); United States v. Sperling, supra, 506 F.2d at 1343 ; United States v. Sisca, 50…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Giattino
See, e.g., United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 233 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Mason Gray, (Two Cases)
See, e.g., United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 180 (4th Cir.) (holding that defendant waived claim that Black citizens were underrepresented in the jury pool because defendant failed to raise claim within the statutory time limits), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miltland Raleigh-Durham v. Myers
See, e.g., United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 233-34 (2d Cir.) (interstate commerce was affected when New York defendant purchased a house in New Jersey in connection with the illegal enterprise), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981). (4) Myers and Myers Financial — aided and abetted by or in conspiracy with Pettigrew, Redwood and Mudie — have engaged in a “pattern of racketeering activity” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. *1056 § 1961(1), (5) by committing numerous acts of mail fraud and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1343 and securi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. United States
(2×)
Although we have noted that “mere proximity to an illegal item does not of itself prove knowledge coupled with dominion or control,” Curry v. United States, 520 A.2d 255, 263 (D.C.1987), we will sustain a conviction for constructive possession of drugs where that proximity “is colored by evidence linking the accused to an ongoing criminal operation of which that possession is a part.” Id.; see also United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981). 19 In this case, the evidence amply supports a conclusion that at le…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re F.T.J.
Compare, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) (“actual possession” means “the ability of a person to knowingly exercise direct physical custody or control over the property in question”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); United States v. Spears, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 293 , 449 F.2d 946, 955 (1971) (words "immediate actual possession," for purposes of robbery statute, mean "an area within which the victim could reasonably be expected to exercise some physical control”), with United States v. Holland, supra (“constructive posse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re FTJ
Compare, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) ("actual possession" means "the ability of a person to knowingly exercise direct physical custody or control over the property in question"), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); United States v. Spears, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 293 , 449 F.2d 946, 955 (1971) (words "immediate actual possession," for purposes of robbery statute, mean "an area within which the victim could reasonably be expected to exercise some physical control"), with United States v. Holland, supra ("constructive possession means …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frederick Charles Latham, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir.) (defendant underwent medically necessary but non-emergency surgery immediately before trial), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. Pastor, 557 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.1977) (defendant intentionally waited several hours before seeking medical attention for alleged heart attack in order to frustrate trial); People v. Rogers, 150 Cal.App.2d 403 , 309 P.2d 949 (1957) (defendant either feigned or induced insulin shock in order to delay trial).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Curry v. United States
United States v. Covington, 459 A.2d 1067, 1070-71 (D.C.1983); see also United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dohn Ardell Patterson
Id. at 537 ; see also United States v. Nashawaty, 571 F.2d 71, 75 (1st Cir.1978); United States v. Belcher, 577 F.Supp. 1241, 1245 (E.D.Va. 1983). 18 . 639 F.2d 107 (2d Cir.1981); see also United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 , 232 n. 8 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981). 19 . 639 F.2d at 109-10 . 20 . — U.S. at-nn. 6 & 7, 105 S.Ct. at 2457 nn. 6 & 7. 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alberto Pena, Juan Urena
Piteo, 762 F.2d at 52; see also United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 , 229 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981); United States v. McGrath, 613 F.2d 361, 366 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 2946 , 64 L.Ed.2d 827 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America
See also United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gennaro Langella
See, e.g., United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 235-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
See also United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 236-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeCrescente
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 80-6922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (3) · Second Circuit (1)
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.