green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 8×
9.0 score
“a defendant has a due process right to be protected against unlimited multiple punishment for the same act ... simply because overlapping damage awards violate that sense of 'fundamental fairness' which lies at the heart of constitutional due process.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Banacki v. OneWest Bank, FSB
on the issues of negligence, strict products liability, adequacy of warnings at relevant time periods, breach of warranty, fraud and conspiracy, commonality begins to be obscured by individual case histories
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
daikon shield
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
qederal court decisions ... unanimously agree that sanctions pursuant to rule 37 may not be awarded absent violation of a court order
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Browning v. Snead
acts of omission are actionable ... to the same extent as are acts of commission.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
LCS Homes, Inc. v. Driggs Building Systems, Inc. (In Re LCS Homes, Inc.)
a repudiation is a party's manifestation that it is not going to provide those goods or services when they will be due at some future date.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Leonen v. Johns-Manville Corp.
a defendant has a due process right to be protected against unlimited multiple punishment for the same act ... simply because overlapping damage awards violate that sense of 'fundamental fairness' which lies at the heart of constitutional due process.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re William Temple, Alfonso Crisconi, Mary Emma Clark, Mabel Johnson, Clara Huber, Evelyn B. Davis, Saskia Hessler, Hyman Clamer, Fay Joy Roley, Bill King, Lamar Powell, Albert Whatley, and Baron & Budd, P.C.
dalkon shield
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stolz v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local Union No. 971
In re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1982) ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Cf. 817, 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hsia
See Attorney General v. The Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928, 946 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarke v. Advanced Private Networks, Inc.
See In re Northern District of California Dalkon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847, 851-52 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983) (error to certify a limited fund punitive damages class without hearing evidence of defendant’s net worth, earnings or available insurance coverage and establishing “as a fact” that defendant's assets were too limited to permit conventional litigation). .
cited
Cited "see"
Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Tuco, Inc.
See Bill’s Coal Co. v. Board of public Utilities of Springfield, Missouri, 682 F.2d 883, 886 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 816 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fedorov v. United States
(2×)
See Attorney General of the United States v. The Irish People, Inc., 221 U.S.App.D.C. 406, 410 , 684 F.2d 928, 932 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwab v. Wood
See Bruner v. Dunaway, 684 F.2d 422, 426 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 816 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); Putman v. Gerloff, 639 F.2d 415, 423 (8th Cir.1981); Bracey v. Grenoble, 494 F.2d 566 (3d Cir.1974); Skevofilax v. Quigley, 586 F.Supp. 532, 543 (D.N.J.1984); Davidson v. Dixon, 386 F.Supp. 482 (D.Del.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor
See In re No. District of Cal. “Dalkon Shield” IUD Products, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United States
(2×)
Accord Attorney General of the United States v. Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928, 953 (D.C.Cir.1982) (noting and employing precedent that "balancing of the parties' interests is required * * * efforts at accommodation of both sides must be made") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bootz v. Childs
See Attorney General of U.S. v. Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928, 953 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); Campbell v. Gerrans, 592 F.2d 1054 -58 (9th Cir.1979); Wehling v. CBS, 608 F.2d 1084, 1087 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.
See In re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847, 853 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); McElhaney v. Eli Lilly & Co., 93 F.R.D. 875, 880 (D.S.D.1982); Rosenfeld v. A.H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Skevofilax v. Quigley
See Bruner v. Dunaway, 684 F.2d 422, 426 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 816 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983); Putman v. Gerloff, 639 F.2d 415, 423 (8th Cir.1981); Harris v. Chanclor, 537 F.2d 203, 206 (5th Cir.1976); McQurter v. City of Atlanta, supra at 1415; Davidson v. Dixon, 386 F.Supp. 482 (D.Del.1974), aff'd 529 F.2d 511 (3d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company, the Dow Chemical Company, Monsanto Company, Hercules Incorporated, and T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc., in Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
See In re Northern District of California "Dalkon Shield" IUD Product Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); Payton v. Abbott Labs, 100 F.R.D. 336 (D.Mass. 1983); Delaney v. Borden, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 44 (E.D.Pa.1983), Mertens v. Abbott Laboratories, 99 F.R.D. 38 (D.N.H.1983); Thompson v. Procter & Gamble Co., No. C-80-3711, slip op., (N.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.
See In re Northern District of California “Daikon Shield” IUD Product Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); Payton v. Abbott Labs, 100 F.R.D. 336 (D.Mass.1983); Delaney v. Borden, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 44 (E.D.Pa.1983); Mertens v. Abbott Laboratories, 99 F.R.D. 38 (D.N.H.1983); Thompson v. Procter & Gamble Co,, No. C-80-3711, slip op., (N.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Napper
Id. at 494; accord Attorney General v. Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928, 932 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, Irish People, Inc. v. Smith, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983), rehearing denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1509 , 75 L.Ed.2d 937 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theortres Parham, United States of America v. Thomas Charles Johnson, A/K/A T.C. Johnson
(2×)
Compare Attorney General of United States v. Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928, 946 (D.C.Cir.1982) (no selectivity where defendant could not point to others who had violated Foreign Agents Registration Act and had not been prosecuted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983) with United States v. Gordon, 817 F.2d 1538, 1540 (11th Cir.1987) (selective prosecution found where others had not been prosecuted for the same offense), rev’d in part on other grounds, 836 F.2d 1312 (11th Cir.1988). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond Gateway Coal Co. v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)
See, e.g., Bill’s Coal Company v. Board of Public Utilities, 682 F.2d 883 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 816 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1983) (urging of erroneous interpretation of contractual clause, even if done in bad faith, did not amount to anticipatory repudiation where neither party’s performance under the contract was thereby affected).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381"
See, e.g., In re Northern Dist. of Cal. Daikon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1171 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); Payton v. Abbott Labs., 100 F.R.D. 336 (D.Mass.1983); Yandle v. PPG Industries, Inc., 65 F.R.D. 566 (E.D.Tex.1974); Boring v. Medusa Portland Cement Co., 63 F.R.D. 78, 83-85 (M.D.Pa.), appeal dismissed, 505 F.2d 729 (3d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gilbert
A defendant bears the burden of establishing (1) that he was singled out for prosecution and (2) that the decision to prosecute him, rather than other persons, was based upon an impermissible factor such as race, religion or the exercise of a constitutional right. 2 Id.; see also Attorney General of the United States v. The Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928 (D.C.Cir.1982), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983); People v. Smith, 155 Cal.App.3d 1103 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 196 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1160 , 105 S.Ct. 910 , 83 L.Ed.2d 924 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Synanon Church v. United States
See, e.g., Attorney General v. Irish People, Inc., 684 F.2d 928 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Beebe v. Pacific Realty Trust
See also In Re Northern Dist. of Calif., Daikon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847, 854-55 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 817 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shupper
v.
Committee on Character and Fitness of the Supreme Court of South Carolina
v.
Committee on Character and Fitness of the Supreme Court of South Carolina
No. 82-832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · D.C. Circuit (1) · E.D. Michigan (1) · D. New Jersey (1) · D. Oregon (1) · E.D. Virginia (1) · S.D. West Virginia (1)
Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.