green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Moskowitz v. Lopp
But see Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 410-12 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insiders owe no fiduciary duty to option traders); Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc., 671 F.Supp. 297 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities Litigation
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407 , 413 n. 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Carlon v. Michael E. Thaman
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407 , 413 n. 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
470 Stratford Holding Co. v. Local 32B-32J, Service Employees International Union
See Pari-Mutuel Clerks Union of Louisiana, Local 328 v. Fair Grounds Corp., 703 F.2d 913 , 918 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Data Controls North, Inc. v. Financial Corp. of America
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc., 671 F.Supp. 297, 304 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (quoting Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 412 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Starkman v. Warner Communications, Inc.
See Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corporation, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (insiders trading in corporation stock owed no duty to disclose or abstain to purchaser of call options and, therefore, purchaser had no standing to allege violations of the Securities and Exchange Act); Deutschman v. Beneficial Corporation, 668 F.Supp. 358 (D.Del.1987) (purchaser of call options lacked standing to assert claim of misrepresentations and omissions by corporation where no insider traded in options or in corporation stock); Bianco v. Texas Instrumen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insider trading, no public statement); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713 (8th Cir.1978) (misrepresentations surrounding the initial offering of corporate bonds, a situation in which price is not a reflection of the transactions of investors). 48 The situation before us is clearly not analogous to these cases.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics, 704 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) (insider trading, no public statement); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713 (8th Cir.1978) (misrepresentations surrounding the initial offering of corporate bonds, a situation in which price is not a reflection of the transactions of investors).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Warner Communications Securities Litigation
Compare In re Digital Equipment Securities Litigation, 601 F.Supp. 311, 315 (D.Mass.1984) (upholding such claims) and Bachman v. Polaroid Corp., 540 F.Supp. 667, 671 (D.Mass.1982) (same) with Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.) (dismissing claim), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983) and In re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities Litigation, 567 F.Supp. 126, 127 (E.D.Mo.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Polak v. Continental Hosts, Ltd.
See also Laventhall v. General Dynamics Corp., 704 F.2d 407, 412 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 150 , 78 L.Ed.2d 140 (1983). (“It is important, however, to emphasize that no cause of action arises under Section 10(b) or Rule 10b-5 simply because an insider has inside information and fails to disclose it”); Staffin v. Greenberg, 672 F.2d 1196, 1202 (3d Cir.1982) (if “no duty to disclose exists,” then there can be no rule 10b-5 liability, even if undisclosed facts are material).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Coody
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 83-25.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.