green
Positive treatment
20.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
Nasrallah states, “final or- ders of removal encompass only the rulings made by the im- migration judge or Board of Immigration Appeals that affect the validity of the final order of removal.” 104 S. Ct. at 1691.2 2 F.J.A.P. argues that a reinstatement decision is a removal order be- cause “order of deportation” as defined in in § 1101(a)(47)(A) says a re- moval order is any order ordering deportation.
cited
Cited "see"
Orange County v. Williams
See Williams v. State, 437 So.2d 133 (Fla.1983) (affirming first-degree murder conviction and sentence of death), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 1690 , 80 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillips v. State
See Williams v. State, 437 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1690 , 80 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edwards, Governor of Louisiana
v.
Valteau
v.
Valteau
No. A-770.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1984.
Published
Application for stay of the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, entered March 21, 1984, pending appeal, presented to Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied.