green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Tile, Marble, Terrazzo, Finishers, Shopworkers & Granite Cutters International Union v. Local 221, Tile, Marble, Terrazzo, Finishers, Shopworkers & Granite Cutters International Union
Id. at 839.
cited
Cited "see"
Charles James Witt v. Roadway Express, Jim Kasperski, Teamsters Local No. 41, and Warren Stevens
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 838-39 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks v. State
See U.S. v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553, 1557 (11th Cir. 1983)("Mills acknowledges that under the law in this circuit, the right to appointed counsel and the right to proceed pro se exist in the alternative and the decision to permit a defendant to proceed in hybrid fashion rests in the sound discretion of the trial court."), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall Dwayne Muse
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553, 1563 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Witt v. Roadway Express
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers, 723 F.2d 837 (11th Cir.) (applying six-month limitations period to breach of duty of fair representation claim not joined by breach of contract claim against employer), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 732 F.2d 1188 (3d Cir. 1984) (action for breach of duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act); Eatz v. DME Unit of Local Union Number 3, 794 F.2d 29 (2d Cir.1986) (six-month limitations period applies to unfair representation claims standing alone).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Santiago, A/K/A \Chuco\""
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553, 1559 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STEEL WORKERS v. Craig
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC , 723 F.2d 837 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzales
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984) (defendant established that the deceased witness had confessed to the murder for which defendant was charged).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Grasty v. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 840 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grasty v. Amalgamated Clothing And Textile Workers Union
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 840 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984). 34 The rationale for applying a six-month statute of limitations to, for example, the claim based on fraudulent ratification of the strike vote is evident since a longer period could be disruptive to the entire relationship between the company and the union.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael Moreno Morales, United States of America v. Angel Perez Casillas, United States of America v. Jaime Quiles Hernandez, United States of America v. Rafael Torres Marrero, United States of America v. Juan Bruno Gonzalez, United States of America v. Nelson Gonzalez Perez, United States of America v. William Colon Berrios, United States of America v. Jose Rios Polanco, United States of America v. Nazario Mateo Espada
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553, 1559 (11th Cir.1983) (district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of "illegal or otherwise improper acts which did not constitute elements of the crime charged in the indictment, but [which] pertained to a chain of events forming the context, motive, and set-up of the crime"), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984). 46 Count 19 alleged that Rafael Torres Marrero committed perjury in an March 12, 1980 deposition when he claimed, among other things, that Soto Arrivi, after being shot, fell down a steep…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morales
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553, 1559 (11th Cir.1983) (district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of “illegal or otherwise improper acts which did not constitute elements of the crime charged in the indictment, but [which] pertained to a chain of events forming the context, motive, and set-up of the crime”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union, Local 54 v. Ramada, Inc.
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 839 (11th Cir.) (the presence of a labor law element, not just the hybrid nature of the suit, make § 10b appropriate), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Clyde L. Davis, Jr., an Individual v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America
See Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 839 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); Vallone, 755 F.2d at 522 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Constance Haas Meester, Jeanne Sanfratello Tumulty, Robert Haas, Edward Conrad Sawyer
See United States v. Mills, 704 F.2d 1553 , 1565 n. 7 (11th Cir.1983) (Pinkerton instruction), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alice Leach and Carmen Irons v. Pan American World Airways, Teamsters Local Union No. 769
See also Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 839 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rollin Lewis v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 771 and Kenneth C. Laukhuff
See also Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1243 , 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984) (applying six-month limitations period to breach of duty of fair representation claim not joined by a section 301 claim against employer).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andres Flores v. The Levy Company, an Illinois Corporation
See also Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984) (presence of “labor law” element plus hybrid nature of suit made application of section 10(b) appropriate in DelCostello).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Teamsters Local Union 553
A “hybrid” claim adds the duty of fair representation element, which has been described as “more a creature of ‘labor law’ ” than of “general contract law.” United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell, 451 U.S. 56, 63 , 101 S.Ct. 1559, 1564 , 67 L.Ed.2d 732 (1981); see also Erkins v. United Steelworkers of America, 723 F.2d 837, 839 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3517 , 82 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-1861.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1984.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.