green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
BP Energy Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Cities of Bethany v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1139-40 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Allan C. Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee
See Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 732 F.2d 548, 551-52 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Aldridge v. Lily-tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Committee
See Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 732 F.2d 548, 551-52 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Marshall further explained that "[i]t is particularly pertinent for our purposes that Congress did not prohibit 'integration,' a calculation practice under which benefit levels are determined by combining pension funds with other income streams available to the retired employee[ ]." Id. at 514, 101 S.Ct. at 1901 ; see Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 732 F.2d 548, 551 (6th Cir.) (quoting same passage as support for holding that an employer could offset benefits owed under one pension plan by benefits owed under another), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Marshall further explained that “[i]t is particularly pertinent for our purposes that Congress did not prohibit ‘integration,’ a calculation practice under which benefit levels are determined by combining pension funds with other income streams available to the retired employee[].” Id. at 514, 101 S.Ct. at 1901 ; see Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 732 F.2d 548, 551 (6th Cir.) (quoting same passage as support for holding that an employer could offset benefits owed under one pension plan by benefits owed under another), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Merritt Logan, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc., Appeal of Engineering and Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1522 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Hussman Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1523 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Merritt Logan, Inc., at No. 89-1524 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Fleming Companies, Inc. And Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. At No. 89-1525
See Stich v. United States, 730 F.2d 115, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); Joy Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Merritt Logan, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc. (In re Merritt Logan, Inc.)
See Stich v. United States, 730 F.2d 115, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); Joy Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Demisay v. Local 144, Nursing Home Pension Fund
See Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 732 F.2d 548, 550-51 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Gallup, New Mexico, Intervenor. (Three Cases) City of Gallup, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Intervenor. (Three Cases)
See Cities of Bethany et al. v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1136 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Cities of Bethany et al. v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1136 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Electric Power Company, Intervenor
See Cities of Bethany v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1143-44 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Louis Chavis and Lambert Daniel Slisz
See Stick v. United States, 730 F.2d 115, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); Bryan v. Cargill, Inc., 723 F.2d 1202, 1203 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adcock v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
In such a sitaution it is a reasonable inference that Congress intended some law, and therefore federal law, to apply____” “[T]he court concludes that the statutory scheme, as well as the legislative history of ERISA, support the “reasonable inference” that this Court is mandated to formulate and apply a federal rule of decision in this case.” Id. at 2139, 42 B.R. 1005 , quoting Wayne Chemical v. Columbus Agency Service Corp., 426 F.Supp. 316, 322 (N.D.Ind.), aff’d and modified, 567 F.2d 692 (7th Cir. 1977); accord Holliday v. Xerox Corp., 555 F.Supp. 51, 55 (E.D.Mich.1982), aff’…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Riggi, John M., in 90-5974. United States of America v. Timpani, Salvatore, in 90-5975
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Adams, 759 F.2d 1099 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 971 , 106 S.Ct. 336 , 88 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985), Stick v. United States, 730 F.2d 115, 117 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); Virgin Islands v. Blyden, 626 F.2d 310, 313 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Sebring Utilities Comm’n v. FERC, 591 F.2d 1003 , 1010 n. 28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 167 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979); see also Cities of Bethany, Bushnell, etc. v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1139 (D.C.Cir.) (under similar statute, Federal Power Act § 205(b), 16 U.S.C. § 824d(b), “mere fact of a rate disparity ... does not establish unlawful rate discrimination”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Boston Gas Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Colonial Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Bay State Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Intervenors. Central Hudson Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Bay State Gas Company, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Boston Gas Company, New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Intervenors. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Colonial Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Boston Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Intervenors. City of Norwich, Connecticut, Department of Public Utilities, and the Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, Municipal Gas and Electric Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Colonial Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Boston Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Intervenors. New Jersey Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Boston Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Intervenors. Boston Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Bay State Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, National Helium Corporation, Intervenors
Sebring Utilities Comm'n v. FERC, 591 F.2d 1003 , 1010 n. 28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 879 , 100 S.Ct. 167 , 62 L.Ed.2d 109 (1979); see also Cities of Bethany, Bushnell, etc. v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131, 1139 (D.C.Cir.) (under similar statute, Federal Power Act § 205(b), 16 U.S.C. § 824d(b), "mere fact of a rate disparity ... does not establish unlawful rate discrimination"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weiner v. Kneller
See also Stich v. United States, 730 F.2d 115, 118 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 , 105 S.Ct. 294 , 83 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984) (supplementation of expert testimony with analysis from article made available only a week before trial permissible, even though not included in pretrial statement, where new research was consistent with earlier work done by same expert and based on same data); Murphy, supra, 639 F.2d at 234-35 , (given lack of prejudice and importance of evidence involved, plaintiff’s expert witness should have been allowed to rebut testimony contrary to his original theory "despi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schwartzbauer
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6868.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1984.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.