green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“the south carolina supreme court has held that a person is performing the trade, business or occupation of an owner if he is engaged in work that is essential to the function of the employer's business, even if the employer never performed that particular work with his own employ…”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carrier v. Westvaco Corp.
the south carolina supreme court has held that a person is performing the trade, business or occupation of an owner if he is engaged in work that is essential to the function of the employer's business, even if the employer never performed that particular work with his own employ…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F.2d 1242 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985) ("The mere fact that a judge acted as prosecutor in an unrelated case is insufficient to constitute reversible error."); Goodspeed v. Beto, 341 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 926 , 87 S.Ct. 867 , 17 L.Ed.2d 798 (1967) ("[T]he judge who presided was a former district attorney who had prosecuted the petitioner for different crimes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vasquez
See Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F.2d 1242 (11th Cir.) (lapse of four hours did not render warnings “stale” because defendant was aware of his rights, knew that he was a suspect in the case, and was not naive, mentally deficient or pressured), reh’g denied, 740 F.2d 979 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 , reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 921 , 105 S.Ct. 3547 , 87 L.Ed.2d 670 (1985); United States v. Hopkins, 433 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1013 , 91 S.Ct. 1252 , 28 L.Ed.2d 550 (1971) (while warnings are not accorded unlimited efficacy…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Padilla
(2×)
See State v. Herrera, 102 N.M. 254, 260 , 694 P.2d 510, 516 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2332 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Jordan
See United States v. Suter, 755 F.2d 523, 525 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985) (no requirement for court to advise defendant of range of civil penalties and judgments he might face as a result of a guilty plea to criminal charge).
cited
Cited "see"
McCarthy v. Bronson
See Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F.2d 1242, 1250 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fortenberry v. State
See Jarrell v. Balkcom , 735 F.2d 1242 , 1249-50 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985); Fisher v. State , 468 N.E.2d 1365 , 1368 (Ind. 1984); State v. Hein , 138 Ariz. 360 , 674 P.2d 1358 , 1362 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristion
See United States v. Suter, 755 F.2d 523, 526 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985); United States v. Thompson, 680 F.2d 1145, 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 735 , 74 L.Ed.2d 958 (1982); Fed.R.Civ.P. 32(d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott Michael Brasier v. Peter A. Douglas Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See Hux v. Murphy, 733 F.2d 737, 739 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985), overruled on other grounds, Wiley v. Rayl, 767 F.2d 679 , 681 n. 2 (10th Cir.1985); Morishita v. Morris, 702 F.2d at 209 ; cf. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 75 , 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1093 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985) (“when resolution of the state procedural law question depends on a federal constitutional ruling, the state-law prong of the court’s holding is not independent of federal law,” so federal review is not precluded).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hartley
(2×)
See Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F. 2d 1242 , 1252 n. 11, reh'g denied, 740 F. 2d 979 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 848 , reh'g *261 denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 3547 , 87 L.Ed. 2d 670 (1985); People v. Grant, 45 N.Y. 2d 366, 373 , 380 N.E. 2d 257, 261 , 408 N.Y.S. 2d 429, 432 (1978); Stone, The Miranda Doctrine in the Burger Court, 177 Sup.Ct.Rev. 99 (1977) (hereinafter The Miranda Doctrine ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roland Ralph Wiley, III v. Gary Rayl and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
See Jones v. Hess, 681 F.2d 688 , 695 n. 9 (10th Cir.1982) 2 In reaching this conclusion we overrule Hux v. Murphy, 733 F.2d 737 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marshall
Ed. 2d 194 (1976). “[TJhere is no requirement that an accused be continually reminded of his rights once he has intelligently waived them . . . .” (Citation omitted.) United States v. Anthony, 474 F.2d 770, 773 (5th Cir. 1973); see also Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F.2d 1242, 1254 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S. Ct. 2331 , 85 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
Sanchez v. State, 751 P.2d 1300, 1308 (Wyo.1988) (citing Cutbirth v. State, 663 P.2d 888, 891 (Wyo.1983)); see also Saldana v. State, 685 P.2d 20, 23 (Wyo.1984), cert. denied 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jack D. Brocksmith
See, e.g., United States v. Suter, 755 F.2d 523 , 527 n. 5 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985); United States v. Feinberg, 535 F.2d 1004, 1010 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 337 , 50 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cordova
As with the details provided by the informant in Spinelli, which stated no more than that Spinelli spent a large amount of his time in an apartment that contained two phones with separate, identified numbers, the details provided in this affidavit relate to innocent facts that do not, either separately or taken as a whole, suggest illegal activity. 393 U.S. at 416 , 89 S.Ct. at 589 ; see also State v. Herrera, 102 N.M. 254 , 694 P.2d 510 (mere fact that residence was described in minute detail did not give rise to probable cause to believe that suspect made such residence his home), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond W. Vance
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Suter, 755 F.2d 523, 527 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985); United States v. Green, 735 F.2d 1203, 1205 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. Davies, 683 F.2d 1052, 1053, 1055 (7th Cir.1982); Phillips v. United States, 679 F.2d 192, 194 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olson
United States v. Davies, 683 F.2d 1052, 1054 (7th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Suter, 755 F.2d 523, 526-27 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
See also Smith v. FCX, Inc., 744 F.2d 1378 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1103 , 105 S.Ct. 2330 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Crozier v. State
See also Saldana v. State, Wyo., 685 P.2d 20 (1984), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2331 , 85 L.Ed.2d 848 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herrera
v.
New Mexico
v.
New Mexico
No. 84-5797.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Carolina (1)
Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied.