green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.9 score
“north carolina courts are not constrained by the 'case or controversy' requirement of article iii of the united states constitution.”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Time Warner Entm't advance/newhouse P'ship v. Town of Landis, North Carolina
north carolina courts are not constrained by the 'case or controversy' requirement of article iii of the united states constitution.
discussed
Cited "see"
News and Observer Pub. Co. v. Easley
See Neuse River Found., Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., 155 N.C.App. 110 , 118, 574 S.E.2d 48 , 54 (2002) ("It is critical for our purposes to remain focused on North Carolina's timeless separation of powers doctrine rather than be distracted by public policy debate embedded in any ephemeral issue of a case."), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 628 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEUSE RIVER FOUND., INC.
v.
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
v.
SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC.
No. 67P03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 27, 2003.
Published
Citer courts: North Carolina Business Court (1)
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 February 2003.