green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Holtslander
Even if a count is valid on its face, it is nonetheless duplicitous where the evidence presented to the grand jury or at trial makes plain that multiple acts occurred during the relevant time period, rendering it nearly impossible to determine the particular act upon which the jury reached its verdict" ( People v Black , 65 AD3d at 813 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Raymo , 19 AD3d 727, 729 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 793 [2005]; People v Levandowski , 8 AD3d 898, 899-900 [2004]).
cited
Cited "see"
Perez v. Smith
See People v. Perez, 5 N.Y.3d 793 , 801 N.Y.S.2d 813 , 835 N.E.2d 673 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Tompkins
We conclude that County Court properly refused to suppress defendant’s statements to the police despite his representation by counsel in an unrelated criminal proceeding, “inasmuch as there is no evidence in the record that the interrogating police officers had any knowledge ... of defendant’s representation by counsel therein” (People v Johnson, 61 NY2d 932, 934 [1984]; see People v Ragaglia, 16 AD3d 1100 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 793 [2005]; cf. People v Burdo, 91 NY2d 146, 149-150 [1997]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Tomlinson
Thus, contrary to defendant’s contentions, it was not “nearly impossible to determine the particular act upon which the jury reached its verdict” as to the challenged counts (People v Dalton, 27 AD3d 779, 781 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 754 , 811 [2006]; see People v Raymo, 19 AD3d 727 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 793 [2005]; People v Barber, 13 AD3d 898, 899 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 796 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
RAGAGLIA
v.
RAGAGLIA
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 13, 2005.
Published
Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Kaye, Ch.J.).