green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
“if a federal prosecutor has knowledge of and access to exculpatory information as defined in brady and its progeny that is outside the district, then the prosecutor must disclose it to the defense.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Terio v. Great Western Bank
district courts regularly exercise their discretion to deny technically valid motions for default.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hays v. State
if a federal prosecutor has knowledge of and access to exculpatory information as defined in brady and its progeny that is outside the district, then the prosecutor must disclose it to the defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
Maverick Bankcard, Inc. v. Nurture Solutions, LLC
See Alan Neuman Prods. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388 , 1392–93 (9th Cir.1988) 16 (reversing default judgment for plaintiff on RICO claims because the complaint failed 17 sufficiently to allege such claims), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989). 18 Maverick’s failure to state a claim against Torre on which it may recover is an 19 additional reason the Court DENIES the Motion.5 20 V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferm v. United States Trustee (In Re Crowe)
See In re Black, 222 B.R. 896 (9th Cir. BAP 1998) (citing Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1391-92 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Juan Diaz
See United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melendez
See United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989); see also United States v. Diaz, 864 F.2d 544, 547-48 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1070 , 109 S.Ct. 2075 , 104 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989); United States v. Torres, 862 F.2d 1025, 1026, 1030-32 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United States
See United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir.) (stating that the prosecution has knowledge of information in the possession or control of federal agencies participating in the investigation), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989); United States v. Polizzi 801 F.2d 1543, 1553 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hsieh Hui Mei Chen, 754 F.2d 817, 824 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1139 , 105 S.Ct. 2684 , 86 L.Ed.2d 701 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall Wynn, United States of America v. Abel Oliveras-Perez, United States of America v. Adrian Plasencia-Garcia
See United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1038 (9th Cir.) (plain error review where the defendant neither specified the basis for his objection to a unanimity instruction, nor requested an alternative instruction), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melendez
See United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989); see also United States v. Diaz, 864 F.2d 544, 547-48 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1070 , 109 S.Ct. 2075 , 104 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989); United States v. Torres, 862 F.2d 1025, 1026, 1030-32 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Upton
See United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir.) (“The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody or control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, Captain
(2×)
See Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989) (on appeal the defendant is entitled to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint and its allegations to support the judgment); see also 10 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone Clark, United States of America v. Anthony Ford
See United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989); United States v. Diaz, 864 F.2d 544 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1070 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Maria Rodriguez
See United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1039 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989) (plain error reversal only invoked when necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice or to preserve integrity and reputation of judicial process). 22 AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 1 The government here introduced expert testimony similar to that introduced in Castro
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellee
See Alan Neuman Productions v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392-93 (9th Cir.1988) (reversing default judgment for plaintiff on RICO claims because the complaint failed properly to allege such claims), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Karl-Heinz Herborg v. Inter-Continental Brokerage Corporation
See Alan Neuman Productions v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Presley
See, e.g., Alan 10 Neuman Productions v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388 , 1392–93 (9th Cir.1988) (reversing default 11 judgment for plaintiff on RICO claims because the complaint failed properly to allege such 12 claims), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989); Aldabe, 616 F.2d at 1092-93 (“Given the lack of 13 merit in appellant’s substantive claims, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion 14 in declining to enter a default judgment in favor of appellant”). 15 ANALYSIS 16 Under the first step of Rule 55’s two-part analysis, the Court concludes Plaintiff has 17 satisfied the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC v. Trell (In re Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC)
Co., Ltd. v. Houston Nat’l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975); see also Alan Neuman Prods., Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989); Wahl v. McIver, 773 F.2d 1169, 1174 (11th Cir. 1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1995
Id. at 937 ; see also United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1035 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Armstrong
Id. at 937 ; see also United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1035 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1993
See, e.g., Alan Neuman Prod., Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392-93 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989); Sun Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Dierdorff, 825 F.2d 187, 196 (9th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernardo Valencia
See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a); see also United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032, 1037 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 167 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. David J. Lindsay and D.J. Lindsay, Inc., David J. Lindsay, Cross-Appellee
We have held that a defendant’s use of a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking offense can be established “where circumstances indicate that the defendant intended to use the weapon by strategically placing it so that it could be available for use during a drug transaction.” United States v. Medina, 944 F.2d 60, 66 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1508 , 117 L.Ed.2d 646 (1992); see also United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dierschke v. O'Cheskey
See, e.g., Alan Neuman Prod., Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir.1988) (noting the three-part test and affirming refusal of a Rule 55(c) motion based solely on plaintiff's culpable conduct), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 858 , 110 S.Ct. 168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524 (9th Cir.1991) (finding the tripartite test disjunctive); United States v. Proceeds of Sale of 3,888 Pounds of Atlantic Sea Scallops, 857 F.2d 46 (1st Cir.1988) (default judgment); Cassidy v. Tenorio, 856 F.2d 1412 (9th Cir.1988) (default judgment); Breuer Elec.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca4 1992
See, e.g., United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858 (1989); United States v. Diaz, 864 F.2d 544, 547-48 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1070 (1989).
Nelson
v.
City of Milwaukee
v.
City of Milwaukee
No. 89-5043.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1) · S.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.