green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Drug Plastics & Glass Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354, 360 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810 , 110 S.Ct. 52 , 107 L.Ed.2d 21 (1989) (“Because the factual activity alleged in the union’s charge in this case was the precise activity that supported the Board’s allegations [in the complaint],” the Board had jurisdiction.) (emphasis omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
Section 3 in turn defines an occupational safety and health" standard" as one which "requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment." 29 U.S.C. § 652 (8) (1982); see also People v. Chicago Magnet Wire Corp., 126 Ill.2d 356 , 128 Ill.Dec. 517, 520 , 534 N.E.2d 962 , 965 (§ 18 precludes "a State's development and enforcement of `occupational health and safety standards.'") (discussing OSHA preemption of State criminal laws) (citat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Paper Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Intervenors
See, e.g., Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354, 357-58 (D.C.Cir.1988) (employer has duty to bargain before implementing permanent subcontract because “permanent subcontract diminishes the bargaining unit by the scope of the subcontract”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810 , 110 S.Ct. 52 , 107 L.Ed.2d 21 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cruz Pedraza, Alejandrina Pedraza, Roberto Pedraza and Mary Ellen Pedraza v. Shell Oil Company, Cruz Pedraza, Alejandrina Pedraza, Roberto Pedraza and Mary Ellen Pedraza v. Shell Oil Co.
See also Puffer's Hardware Inc. v. Donovan, 742 F.2d 12, 16 (1st Cir.1984); National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. Killian, 918 F.2d 671, 677-78 (7th Cir.1990). 16 Section 3 in turn defines an occupational safety and health "standard" as one which "requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment." 29 U.S.C. § 652 (8) (1982); see also People v. Chicago Magnet Wire Corp., 126 Ill.2d 356 , 128 Ill.Dec. 517, 520 , 534 N.E.2d 962, 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedraza v. Shell Oil Co.
Section 3 in turn defines an occupational safety and health “standard” as one which “requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment.” 29 U.S.C. § 652 (8) (1982); see also People v. Chicago Magnet Wire Corp., 126 Ill.2d 356 , 128 Ill.Dec. 517, 520 , 534 N.E.2d 962, 965 (§ 18 precludes “a State’s development and enforcement of ‘occupational health and safety standards.’ ”) (discussing OSHA preemption of State cri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Large v. Acme Engineering & Manufacturing Corp.
See also, People v. Chicago Magnet Wire Corp., 126 Ill.2d 356 , 128 Ill.Dec. 517 , 534 N.E.2d 962, 966 (1989) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 52 , 107 L.Ed.2d 21 (1989) (The Illinois Supreme Court found that the federal OSHA regulations did not pre-empt the enforcement of state criminal laws concerning conduct of employers in the workplace). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elmer R. BARBEE
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 88-1737.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.