green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Unknown U.S. Marshals
See Flanagan v. Shively, 783 F.Supp. 922, 928-29 (M.D.Pa.1992), aff'd. 980 F.2d 722 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Stankowski v. Farley
See Flanagan v. Shively, 783 F.Supp. 922, 928-29 (M.D.Pa.1992), aff'd. 980 F.2d 722 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strickland v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Pope v. State, 161 S.W.3d 114, 126-27 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2004, pet. granted).
cited
Cited "see"
Garza v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cer t. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Page v. State
(2×)
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex. Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
McMurrough v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Sam Felder, Jr., Also Known as Sammie Felder v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cer t. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993) 4 .There were ten wounds on Hanks's temples and neck.
cited
Cited "see"
Hughbank v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Bolden v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Coggeshall v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Watkins v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 94-95 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Barcenes v. State
See Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 99 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Stars' Desert Inn Hotel & Country Club, Inc. v. Richard Hwang
(2×)
See Gerritsen v. Consulado General De Mexico, 989 F.2d 340, 344 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff may "serve the defendants either personally or by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at their usual place of abode"), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 828 , 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); National Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raven v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
See Henderson v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 971 F.2d 1567, 1569 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993). *241 After Lampf and Beam were decided, the district court held that the plaintiffs’ § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims were time-barred and that the complaint failed to state a claim on the RICO cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raven v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
See Henderson v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 971 F.2d 1567, 1569 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993). 3 After Lampf and Beam were decided, the district court held that the plaintiffs' Sec. 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims were time-barred and that the complaint failed to state a claim on the RICO cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana
(2×)
See Gerritsen v. Consulado General de Mexico, 989 F.2d 340, 345 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1994) (service inadequate for failure to include translation of complaint); Alberti v. Empresa Nicaraguense De La Carne, 705 F.2d 250, 253 (7th Cir.1983) (holding that service on Ambassador did not satisfy § 1608(a) requirement of service on “head of the ministry of foreign affairs”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. United States
First, while we would ordinarily remand this case to the district court to resolve this ambiguity in the first instance, see Logue v. United States, 412 U.S. 521, 528 , 93 S.Ct. 2215, 2219 , 37 L.Ed.2d 121 (1973); Berkman v. United States, 957 F.2d 108, 114-15 (4th Cir.1992), we shall resolve these issues because the parties have addressed it sufficiently to warrant our review, see Howard v. Haddad, 962 F.2d 328, 330 (4th Cir.1992) (declining to remand to the district court because the parties argued the issue in their appellate briefs and at oral argument before this court); see also Henderso…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patricia Williams v. United States of America, & Third Party v. Meridian Management Corporation, Formerly Known as Contract Services Company, Incorporated, Third Party
First, while we would ordinarily remand this case to the district court to resolve this ambiguity in the first instance, see Logue v. United States, 412 U.S. 521, 528 , 93 S.Ct. 2215, 2219 , 37 L.Ed.2d 121 (1973); Berkman v. United States, 957 F.2d 108, 114-15 (4th Cir.1992), we shall resolve these issues because the parties have addressed it sufficiently to warrant our review, see Howard v. Haddad, 962 F.2d 328, 330 (4th Cir.1992) (declining to remand to the district court because the parties argued the issue in their appellate briefs and at oral argument before this court); see also Henderso…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Emery v. State
See, e.g., Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85, 98 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 95 , 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Motley v. State, 773 S.W.2d 283, 294 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Hogue v. State, 711 S.W.2d 9 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 922 , 107 S.Ct. 329 , 93 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F.P. CORPORATION
v.
TWIN MODAL, INC.
v.
TWIN MODAL, INC.
No. 92-2062.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Cited by 116 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.