Cannata v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 4 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Cannata v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 4 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Subscription Television v. Tv, Jkl (ca9, 1981-05-07) · Strongest negative: Ford v. State (indctapp, 1979-09-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Ford v. State (2×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964), 378 U.S. 184 , 83 S.Ct. 28 , 9 L.Ed.2d 52 .
cited Cited "see" National Subscription Television v. Tv, Jkl
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Connecticut Committee Against Pay TV v. FCC, 301 F.2d 835 , 836 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 816 , 83 S.Ct. 28 , 9 L.Ed.2d 57 (1962).
cited Cited "see" National Subscription Television v. S & H TV
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Connecticut Committee Against Pay TV v. FCC, 301 F.2d 835 , 836 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 816 , 83 S.Ct. 28 , 9 L.Ed.2d 57 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CANNATA Et Al.
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK
163.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 4
Raphael H. Weissman for appellants., Leo A. Larkin and Pauline K. Berger for appellee.
Goldberg.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.