green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1975 ·
…to avoid intolerable flooding of the record
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Herman L. Womack, United States of America v. Potomac News Company
(3×)
to avoid intolerable flooding of the record
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry William Daniels, Jr.
(3×)
See United States v. West Coast News Co., Inc., 357 F.2d 855, 865 (6th Cir. 1966), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1967); United States v.' Moody, 371 F. 2d 688, 693-694 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1003 , 87 S.Ct. 1347 , 18 L.Ed.2d 432 (1967).
examined
Cited "see"
William Pinkus v. Peter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, California
(6×)
See especially Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1967), rev’g United States v. West Coast News Co., 357 F.2d 855 (6th Cir. 1966).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph N. Palladino, Joseph N. Palladino, Jr.
(6×)
Compare Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 , 499 n. 3, 86 S.Ct. 942 , 16 L.Ed.2d 31 (1966) (Stewart, J., dissenting), with Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1967), rev'ing United States v. West Coast News Co., 357 F.2d 855 (6th Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Chicago v. Geraci
See also Rosenbloom v. Virginia (1967), 388 U.S. 450 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1312 , 87 S.Ct. 2095 ( per curiam ); Felton v. City of Pensacola (1968), 390 U.S. 340 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1220 , 88 S.Ct. 1098 , rev'g per curiam 200 So.2d 842 (Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wayne County Prosecutor v. Doerfler
Other cases which turned on findings of nonobscenity of this type of magazines include: Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States (1967), 389 US 50 ( 88 S Ct 235 , 19 L Ed 2d 49 ); Conner v. City of Hammond (1967), 389 US 48 ( 88 S Ct 234 , 19 L Ed 2d 47 ); Potomac Netos Co. v. *461 United States (1967), 389 US 47 ( 88 S Ct 233 , 19 L Ed 2d 46 ); Mazes v. Ohio (1967), 388 US 453 ( 87 S Ct 2105 , 18 L Ed 2d 1315 ); A Quantity of Books v. Kansas (1967), 388 US 452 ( 87 S Ct 2104 , 18 L Ed 2d 1314 ); Books, Inc. v. United States (1967), 388 US 449 ( 87 S Ct 2098 , 18 L Ed 2d 1311 ); Aday v. U…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ADAY Et Al.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
Stanley Fleishman for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall for the United States., Melvin L. Wulj, Rolland R. O’Hare and Erwin B. Ellmann for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., and Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amici curiae, in support of the petition., Charles H. Keating, Jr., and James J. Clancy for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.
Brennan, Massachusetts, Clark, Roth, Enterprises, Inc, Day.
Cited by 72 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (4) · D.C. Circuit (3)
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Brennan would grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand in light of Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413. Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm. Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the reversal on the basis of the reasoning set forth in his opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U. S. 478.