green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Trademark protection guards the public from being deceived into purchasing an infringing unwanted product”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sanders v. State
See, Commonwealth v. Bennett (1976), 245 Pa.Super. 457 , 369 A.2d 493 ; but see also, People v. Jones (1973), 30 Cal.App.3d 852 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 749 , appeal dismissed 414 U.S. 804 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 40 . 29 Ill.Dec. at 52 , 391 N.E.2d at 211 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Programmed Tax Systems, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
trademark protection guards the public from being deceived into purchasing an infringing unwanted product
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion Number
See Rice v. U.S. , 348 F. Supp. 254 (1972) affirmed at 479 F.2d 58 (1973), cert denied 94 S.Ct. 66 , 414 U.S. 858 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)
(2×)
See In re Beck Indus., 479 F.2d 410, 417 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Nestle Co., Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc.
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Company, 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973), rehearing denied, 414 U.S. 1033 , 94 S.Ct. 465 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Health Industries, Inc. v. European Health Spas
See, Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reddy Communications, Inc. v. Environmental Action Foundation
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., 395 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1968); Mr. Travel v. V.I.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reddy Communications v. Environmental Action
See Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., 395 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1968); Mr. Travel v. V.I.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of Labor
(2×)
See Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, 475 F. 2d 449, 457 , and n. 7 (CA1), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 858 (1973); Albuquerque-Phoenix Exp., Inc. v. Employment Security Comm’n, 88 N. M. 596, 600-601, 544 P. 2d 1161, 1165-1166 (1975), appeal dismissed sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Olin Corp. v. Illinois, Department of Labor
See, Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, 475 F.2d 449 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 164 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973), New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of Labor, 434 F.Supp. 810 (S.D.N.Y.1977), reversed 566 F.2d 388 (2nd Cir. 1977); Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State of Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, 405 F.Supp. 275 (D.C.Hawaii 1975), and Kimbell, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission, 429 U.S. 804 , 97 S.Ct. 36 , 50 L.Ed.2d 64 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Des Moines v. Huff
(2×)
See State v. Buttolph, 204 N.W.2d 824, 825 (Iowa 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1997
International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 633 F.2d 912, 918 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 3086 , 69 L.Ed.2d 956 (1981); see also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) ("The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another."), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. General Circuit Breaker & Electric Supply Inc.
International Order of Job’s Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 633 F.2d 912, 918 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 3086 , 69 L.Ed.2d 956 (1981); see also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) (“The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another.”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.
Compare Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 , 89 S.Ct. 1902 , 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969) (estoppel doctrine does not apply to patent licensees) with Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) (estoppel doctrine does apply to trademark licensees).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation
See also Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) ("The essence of the wrong of trademark infringement is the passing off of the goods of one as those of another.”); Continental Motors Corp. v. Continental Aviation Corp., 375 F.2d 857, 861 (5th Cir. 1967) ("Confusion, or the likelihood of confusion ... is the real test of trademark infringement.”); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Properties, Inc., 307 F.2d 495, 497 (2d Cir.1962) (“The keystone in that portion of the law of unfair competition which rela…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.
(2×)
In fact, it is an undisputed axiom even in bankruptcy that “ownership of all of the outstanding stock of a corporation is not the equivalent of ownership of the subsidiary’s property or assets.” 5 King, Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th ed., § 1100.06; see, e.g., In re Beck Industries, Inc., 479 F.2d 410 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wcvb-Tv v. Boston Athletic Association
Compare Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 , 89 S.Ct. 1902 , 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969) (estoppel doctrine does not apply to patent licensees) with Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973) (estoppel doctrine does apply to trademark licensees).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum Corporation
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 329 (6th Cir.) (“It is well settled that words and their pictorial representation are treated the same in determining the likelihood of confusion between two marks.”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973); Izod, Ltd. v. Zip Hosiery Co., 405 F.2d 575, 577 (C.C.P.A.1969) (“Members of the purchasing public viewing appellant’s pictorial representation of a feline animal as applied to men’s and women’s outer shirts and appellee’s literal designation TIGER HEAD for men’s work socks might well and re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Ass'n v. Bankcard Holders of America
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.) (“weigh the public benefit in considering trademark principles in connection with the policy of upholding the law of contracts”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Association v. Bankcard Holders Of America
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Co., 477 F.2d 326, 328 (6th Cir.) ("weigh the public benefit in considering trademark principles in connection with the policy of upholding the law of contracts"), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
WLWC Centers, Inc. v. Winners Corp.
See, e.g., Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut Company, 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 66 , 38 L.Ed.2d 108 , reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1033 , 94 S.Ct. 465 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Chevron Oil Co.
See, e. g., Cole v. Chevron Chemical Co.—Oronite Division, 477 F.2d 361 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 67 , 38 L.Ed.2d 109 (1973); Gorsalitz v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., 429 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 2463 , 32 L.Ed.2d 807 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1975
See, e. g., Cole v. Chevron Chemical Co. Oronite Division, 477 F.2d 361 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 858 , 94 S.Ct. 67 , 38 L.Ed.2d 109 (1973); Gorsalitz v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., 429 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 2463 , 32 L.Ed.2d 807 (1972). 15 Chevron argues, however, that even if it is not entitled to indemnification for the injury damages under the contract, it is entitled to reimbursement from Ocean Sciences for the cost of defending Smith's claim.
Ikard
v.
Estate of Wyche
v.
Estate of Wyche
No. 73-117.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.