Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 414 U.S. 855 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 414 U.S. 855 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
137 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 46 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Benters (nc, 2014-12-19) · Strongest negative: United States v. Sartori (mdd, 1983-03-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Sartori
D. Maryland · 1983 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. LaSorsa, 480 F.2d 522 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); 8A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 25.03[2] at 25-5 (2d ed. 1982).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Benters (2×)
N.C. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 576 , 180 S.E.2d 755, 765 (1971) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S. Ct. 157 , 38 L.
discussed Cited "see" Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of Hapeville
N.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 474 F.2d 1108, 1112 (5th Cir.1973), cert. *603 denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (local hazard exception to preemption under § 434 requires “State action”) (emphasis in original); CSX Transportation, Inc. v. City of Tullahoma, Tennessee, 705 F.Supp. 385, 387 (E.D.Tenn.1988); Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Smith, 664 F.Supp. 1228, 1236 (N.D.Ind.1987).
cited Cited "see" Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Quinn-L Capital Corp.
N.D. Tex. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 474 F.2d 1108, 1113-14 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); see also 17 C.
cited Cited "see" State v. Carter
N.C. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561 , 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 114 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Caldwell
N.C. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561 , 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971) (affiant may rely upon information of other officers obtained in the performance of their duties), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 114 , 94 S.Ct. 157 (1973); see also State v. Williams, 49 N.C.
cited Cited "see" Orr v. Schaeffer
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
Craft v. Lefevre, 432 F.Supp. 93, 96 (S.D.N.Y.1977); see United States v. LaSorsa, 480 F.2d 522 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); United States ex rel.
cited Cited "see" Minns v. Paul
4th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Minns v. Paul
4th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
cited Cited "see" State v. West
N.C. Ct. App. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561 , 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 114 , 94 S.Ct. 157 (1973) ; State v. Altman, 15 N.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gibson v. State
Md. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. LaSorsa, 480 F.2d 522, 530-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); King v. People, 87 Colo. 11 , 285 P. 157, 162 (1930); Perry v. State, 303 A.2d 658, 659-60 (Del.1973); Eagan v. State, 480 N.E.2d 946, 952 (Ind.1985); State v. Kramer, 809 S.W.2d 50, 53-54 (Mo.App.1991); Medley v. State, 639 S.W.2d 401, 404 (Mo.App.1982); People v. Lewis, 71 A.D.2d 7 , 422 N.Y.S.2d 380, 382-83 (N.Y.1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Burlington Northern Railroad v. City of Connell
E.D. Wash. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Company, 474 F.2d 1108, 1112 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); Norfolk Southern Ry.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Arnold
N.C. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Vestal, 283 N.C. 249 , 195 S.E.2d 297 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Tullahoma, Tenn.
E.D. Tenn. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Company, 474 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. City of Piqua, Case No. C-3-85-312, (S.D.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Morgan v. State
Alaska Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
N.C. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: compare · confidence low
Public Utility Comm., Pa. Cmwelth., 368 A. 2d 1305 (1977); compare Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Company, 474 F. 2d 1108 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 105 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). State Water Control Board, an Agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). United States of America v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland. State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland. United States of America v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 474 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973) 19 Appellant argues that the foregoing cases are distinguishable because they involve protection of individual constitutional rights, as to which the federal injunctive power is singularly broad.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. District of Columbia
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donelon v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 474 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John McClean
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); Culp v. United States, 131 F.2d 93, 98 (8th Cir. 1942). 5 Single Versus Multiple Conspiracies Appellants’ next contention is that the “evidence negates the single-conspiracy theory and shows instead ‘a series of independent discrete agreements.’ ” We disagree.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donelon
v.
New Orleans Terminal Co.
No. 73-54.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 855
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.