green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Raymond Patriarca v. United States of America, Ronald J. Cassesso v. United States of America, Henry Tameleo v. United States
i am going if i believe a man guilty. and if i don't believe he is guilty, no one is going to make mo prosecute him .
discussed
Cited "see"
Montez 732213 v. Bauman
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 , 19–20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 (1955).2 Our determination of whether comments are calculated to incite prejudice and passion in the jury is informed by the Supreme Court opinion in Viereck. * * * The remarks in the instant case are analogous to the comments adjudged inflammatory and prejudicial in Viereck.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mack 661414 v. Burgess
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 , 19–20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 (1955).2 Our determination of whether comments are calculated to incite prejudice and passion in the jury is informed by the Supreme Court opinion in Viereck. * * * The remarks in the instant case are analogous to the comments adjudged inflammatory and prejudicial in Viereck.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edmond 538334 v. Rewerts
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 , 19–20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 (1955).2 Our determination of whether comments are calculated to incite prejudice and passion in the jury is informed by the Supreme Court opinion in Viereck. * * * The remarks in the instant case are analogous to the comments adjudged inflammatory and prejudicial in Viereck.
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughterbutler 939703 v. Horton
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 , 19–20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 (1955).2 Our determination of whether comments are calculated to incite prejudice and passion in the jury is informed by the Supreme Court opinion in Viereck. * * * The remarks in the instant case are analogous to the comments adjudged inflammatory and prejudicial in Viereck.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosalba Solivan
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14, 19-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955). 2 Our determination of whether comments are calculated to incite prejudice and passion in the jury is informed by the Supreme Court opinion in Viereck .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Schwartz
See United States v. Bess, 593 F.2d 749, 756 (6th Cir.1979) (quoting Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , reh'g denied, 349 U.S. 969 (1955)).
cited
Cited "see"
Zabrani v. Riveron
Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 603.1 (2d ed. 1984); see Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Doucette
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14, 17 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 349 U.S. 920 (1955); United States v. Gerry, 515 F.2d 130, 137 (2d Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Lyda v. State
See Henderson v. United States, (6th Cir. 1955) 218 F.2d 14 , cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 , reh. denied, 349 U.S. 969 , 75 S.Ct. 879 , 99 L.Ed. 1290 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory Drew Harris
See Skinner v. United States, 215 F.2d 767 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 981 , 75 S.Ct. 572 , 99 L.Ed. 763 , rehearing denied, 349 U.S. 924 , 75 S.Ct. 659 , 99 L.Ed. 1256 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Edward L. Penn, Patient
See Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14, 17-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Archie L. Wainwright
See United States v. Bender, 218 F.2d 869 (7th Cir. 1955) cert. den. 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955); United States v. Stayback, 212 F.2d 313 (3rd Cir. 1954) cert. den. 348 U.S. 911 , 75 S.Ct. 289 , 99 L.Ed. 714 (1955); and Dillon v. United States, 218 F.2d 97 (8th Cir. 1955) cert. dismissed 350 U.S. 906 , 76 S.Ct. 191 , 100 L.Ed. 796 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Comm'r
See United States v. Bender, 218 F. 2d 869 (C.A. 7, 1955), certiorari denied 349 U.S. 920 (1955) ; Paul Masters, 25 T.C. 1093 (1956) , affd. 243 F. 2d 335 (C.A. 3, 1957); and Davis v. United States, 226 F. 2d 331 (C.A. 6, 1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United States
See Orebo v. United States, 293 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1961), Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955) and United States v. Battiato, 204 F.2d 717 (7th Cir. 1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Parisette Clark v. United States
See Davidson v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 218 F.2d 609 , and the same case on granting certiorari, 349 U.S. 918 , 75 S.Ct. 659 , 99 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Angelet and William Angelet
See Henderson v. United States, 6 Cir., 218 F.2d 14 , certiorari denied 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S.Ct. 660 , 99 L.Ed. 1253 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cusson
Although some federal courts have noted that ‘‘it is the better practice for the trial judge either to question the witness [personally] or to be present when the examina- tion is conducted by counsel’’; Shuler v. Wainwright, 491 F.2d 1213, 1224 (5th Cir. 1974); see also Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14, 17 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 920 , 75 S. Ct. 660 , 99 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Proctor v. Comm'r
See, e.g., United States v. Bender, 218 F.2d 869 , 871-872 (7th Cir. 1955) cert. denied 349 U.S. 920 (1955) ; United States v. Stayback, 212 F.2d 313 , 317 (3d Cir. 1954) cert. denied 348 U.S. 911 (1955) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwin v. Commissioner
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bender , 218 F.2d 869 , 871 (7th Cir. 1955) , cert. denied 349 U.S. 920 (1955) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Papalardo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 654.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 9, 1955.
Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Joseph A. Barry for the United States.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.