green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Homes, Inc., and Original Supermarket of Homes, Inc. v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors, California Association of Realtors, National Association of Realtors, Supermarket of Homes, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors, California Association of Realtors, National Association of Realtors, Defendants-Counterclaim Cross Claim-Appellees. Supermarket of Homes, Inc., Bar W Properties, Gina W. Williams, Lawrence W. Williams, Plaintiffs-Cross v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors, Inc., California Association of Realtors, National Association of Realtors, Chuck Lamb, Mondae Siegmeth, Sally Collum and Judy Trout, Defendants-Cross
(3×)
See Benny v. Loew's, Inc., 239 F.2d 532 , 537 (9th Cir.1956), aff'd, 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958). 69 The last factor to consider is the effect upon the potential value of the work on the market for it.
examined
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Homes, Inc. v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors
(3×)
See Benny v. Loew’s, Inc., 239 F.2d 532 , 537 (9th Cir.1956), aff'd, 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
F. E. L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago
(3×)
See Loew’s, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 131 F.Supp. 165, 173 (S.D.Cal. 1955), aff’d, Benny v. Loew’s, Inc., 239 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1956), aff’d, Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958); 18 C.J.S.
examined
Cited "see"
MCA, Inc. v. Wilson
(3×)
See Benny v. Loew’s Inc., 239 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1956), aff’d 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958). 18 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
(3×)
See e.g., Benny v. Loew’s Incorporated, 239 F.2d 532 , 536 (9th Cir.1956), aff’d. 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958); W.H.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Walt Disney Productions v. The Air Pirates
(6×)
See e. g., Benny v. Loew’s Inc., 239 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1956), affirmed by an equally divided Court, 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 ; )Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1966) certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 ; 17 U.S.C. § 107 (3) (codifying old law).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc.
(3×)
See, e. g., Loew’s Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 131 F. Supp. 165, 174-176 (S.D.Calif.1955) aff’d, Benny v. Loew’s Inc., 239 F.2d 532 (9 Cir. 1956) aff’d without opinion by an equally divided court, 356 U.S. 43 , 78 S.Ct. 667 , 2 L.Ed.2d 583 (1958); Karll v. Curtis Pub.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.
v.
LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
v.
LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
90.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1958.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
W. B. Carman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Homer I. Mitchell, Warren M. Christopher, Loyd Wright and Dudley K. Wright.
Herman F. Selvin argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Joseph P. Loeb.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.