Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distrib. Corp., 378 U.S. 123 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distrib. Corp., 378 U.S. 123 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
132 citation events across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hamilton v. Wadsworth Publishing Co. (ded, 1984-06-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see, e.g." Hamilton v. Wadsworth Publishing Co. (3×)
D. Del. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp., 320 F.2d 285 (3d Cir.1963), aff'd, 378 U.S. 123 , 84 S.Ct. 1657 , 12 L.Ed.2d 743 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VIKING THEATRE CORP.
v.
PARAMOUNT FILM DISTRIBUTING CORP. ET AL.
481.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
378 U.S. 123
Per Curiam.
Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

Edward Bennett Williams argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Harold Ungar and Henry W. Sawyer III.

Louis Nizer and Morris Wolf argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Nizer on the brief for respondent Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al. were W. Bradley Ward and Louis J. Goffman. With Mr. Wolf on the brief for respondent Stanley Company of America et al. was Franklin Poul. Ralph Earle II, Arthur Littleton, Frederick W. R. Pride and Charles F. Young filed a brief for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., et al., and Edwin P. Rome and Morris L. Weisberg filed a brief for William Goldman Theatres, Inc., respondents.

Herman M. Levy filed a brief for the Theatre Owners of America, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the decision of this case.