green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Tyler v. State
See Clemons v. United States, 408 F.2d 1230, 1242-1243 (D.C.Cir.1968), cert. den. 394 U.S. 964 [ 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 ] (1969); Wigmore, Evidence (Chadbourn rev.) § 1130 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.
See Manson, supra, at 113 n. 14, 97 S.Ct. at 2252 n. 14 (counsel could have “cross-examine[d] the identification witness and argue[d] in summation as to factors causing doubts as to the accuracy of the identification — including reference to both any suggestibility in the identification procedure and any countervailing testimony such as alibi”) (quoting Clemons v. United States, 408 F.2d 1230, 1251 (1968) (Leventhal, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969)); see also Watkins v. Sowders, 449 U.S. 341, 347 , 101 S.Ct. 654, 658 , 66 L.Ed.2d 549 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
Crews v. United States
(2×)
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas v. United States
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 38, 43 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1241, 1246 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. United States
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Brown, supra. See also Annot., Admissibility of Evidence of Photographic Identification, 39 A.L.R.3d 1000 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. United States
(2×)
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 35 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1238 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. United States
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Bryant v. Vincent
See Hines v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1242-1243 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1968); Bolling v. United States, 18 F.2d 863 (4th Cir. 1927); 4 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Director, Patuxent Institution
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 , 1246 n. 17 (1968), cert. den., 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Quarles, 387 F.2d 551 (4 Cir. 1967), cert. den., 391 U.S. 922 , 88 S.Ct. 1815 , 20 L.Ed.2d 659 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Blyden v. Singerman
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1242 (1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ramsey
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 [3], cert. den. 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rufus Brown
(2×)
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 31 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1234 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albion Cranson
See, Clemons v. United States (D.C.Ct.1968) 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237, n. 4 , cert. den. 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 , from which it would appear that the District Courts of the District of Columbia have adopted a specific rule on motions to suppress identification evidence, which is substantially similar to Rule 41(e).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Dichiarinte
(2×)
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 , 1238-1239 n.9 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); Gross v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 94 , 408 F. 2d 1297 (1969). 17 Though we intimate no opinion on the correctness of the district court's denial of the motion to dismiss and the failure to hold a hearing on that motion, we believe that in the interest of judicial economy a hearing should be held on defendant's allegations in the event the Government seeks a new trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Harden v. Follette
In view of the “totality of circumstances surrounding” the instant showup, the court holds that “the conduct of identification procedures [was] * * * ‘so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification’ as to be a denial of due process of law.” Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440, 442 , 89 S.Ct. 1127, 1128 , 22 L.Ed.2d 402 (1969); accord, Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1240-1241 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969), (cellblock showup).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Kemper, A/K/A Elwood Kemper, United States of America v. Joseph N. Richardson
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (en banc 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969). . 388 U.S. at 302, 87 S.Ct. at 1972.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald S. Greene
(2×)
See Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1234 (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Battle v. United States
See Warren v. United States, 486 A.2d 821 , 887 (D.C.1981) (victims’ suppression hearing testimony and police testimony recounting victims’ statements were admissible under prior description testimony exception to hearsay rule insofar as they consisted “solely of descriptions or identifications of the complaining witness’ assailants”) (citing Morris v. United States 398 A.2d 333 (D.C.1978)); see also Yelverton v. United States, 606 A.2d 181 , 184 & n. 8 (D.C.1992) (citing Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. United States
In re L.D.O., 400 A.2d 1055, 1057 (D.C.1979); see also Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 39-40 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1242-43 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Floyd
(2×)
See e. g, Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1240 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Davis, 407 F.2d 846, 847 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. Freie, 545 F.2d 1217,1224 (9th Cir. 1976); Haberstroh v. Montanye, 362 F.Supp. 838 (W.D.N.Y.1973), affirmed 493 F.2d 483 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Sexton
(2×)
See, e. g., Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 408 F.2d 1230, 1240 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States v. Davis, 407 F.2d 846, 847 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. Freie, 545 F.2d 1217, 1224 (9th Cir. 1976); Haberstroh v. Montanye, 362 F.Supp. 838 (W.D.N.Y.1973), affirmed 493 F.2d 483 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Middleton v. United States
(2×)
Compare Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 45 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1248 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crews v. United States
(2×)
See Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 608-12 , 95 S.C.t. 2254 (Powell, J., concurring in part); see also Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Noble
See also United States v. Clark, 294 F.Supp. 44 (DDC 1968), aff'd Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S. App.D.C. 27, 408 F.2d 1230 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
March v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); see also Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S. App.D.C. 27, 408 F.2d 1230 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed. 2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shelton v. United States
See e. g., Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alphonso Cain
See, e. g., Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 40 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1243 (1968, en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Harris v. State of Illinois
Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. at 272 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ; United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. at 240-241 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ; see also, Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (en banc 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry B. Johnson, United States of America v. Clifford L. Estes, A/K/A Clifford Allen
See also Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969), for a discussion of the standard of review established by Wade, Stovall and Simmons. 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Benjamin F. O'COnnOr v. United States
See also Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 408 F.2d 1230 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert L. Hawkins v. United States
See, e. g., Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (en banc 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peek
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.