Shapiro v. Solman, 396 U.S. 5 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Shapiro v. Solman, 396 U.S. 5 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
135 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vaccarella v. Fusari (ctd, 1973-09-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Vaccarella v. Fusari (2×)
D. Conn. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F.Supp. 409, 414 (D.Conn.1969), aff’d, 396 U.S. 5 , 90 S.Ct. 25 , 24 L.Ed.2d 5 (1969), where it was noted: “Connecticut does not have a state law of general applicability imposing an obligation on a stepfather to support his minor stepchildren.
cited Cited "see" Wilczynski v. Harder
D. Conn. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Id. 4 . 1 Conn.Welfare Man. § D-244.1 (1970) provides: “Eligibility.
discussed Cited "see" Russo v. Shapiro (2×)
D. Conn. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F.Supp. 409 , 411 n.1 (D.Conn.1969), aff’d, 396 U.S. 5 , 90 S.Ct. 25 , 24 L.Ed.2d 5 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe v. Sharp (2×)
D. Mass. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because the usage of the term “recipient” in the context of the AFDC statute clearly contemplates grantee children, see Green v. Philbrook, supra, 576 F.2d at 444-5; Chambers v. Klein, supra, 419 F.Supp. 569, 577-8 ; McEIrath v. Califano, supra, 615 F.2d at 438-440 ; See also Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F.Supp. 409, 415 (D.Conn.) (3 judge court), aff’d., 396 U.S. 5 , 90 S.Ct. 25 , 24 L.Ed.2d 5 (1969); and, further, because the Secretary’s interpretation is entitled to the deference accorded to HEW as the agency charged with administration of the Social Security Act, see Lewis v. Martin, 397…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." MR. X v. McCorkle (2×)
D.N.J. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F.Supp. 409 (D.Conn.1969) aff’d per curiam, 396 U.S. 5 , 90 S.Ct. 25 , 24 L.Ed.2d 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
SOLMAN ET AL.
215.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
396 U.S. 5
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Francis X. Dineen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U. S. 309.