green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Cited for
finding by a three judge panel that Florida’s decision to disenfranchise felons was not a violation of the plaintiffs equal protection or due process rights
- Johnson v. Governor of Florida, 353 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2003). (finding by a three judge panel that Florida’s decision to disenfranchise felons was not a violation of the plaintiffs equal protection or due process rights)
- Thomas Johnson v. Governor of the State of FL, 405 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir. 2003). (finding by a three judge panel that Florida's decision to disenfranchise felons was not a violation of the plaintiff's equal protection or due process rights)
At page 12 cited at this page1 citing case
- George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin, No. 24-1791 (4th Cir. Aug. 20, 2025).The Supreme Court summarily affirmed in a one-sentence, per curiam order. 396 U.S. at 12.
Other citing cases
- George Hawkins v. Youngkin, No. 3:23-cv-00232 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2024).
- Ferguson v. Williams, 330 F. Supp. 1012 (N.D. Miss. 1971).
- Smith v. Fussenich, 440 F. Supp. 1077 (D. Conn. 1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BEACHAM
v.
BRATERMAN Et Al.
v.
BRATERMAN Et Al.
404.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1969.
Bruce S. Rogow for appellant., Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and James McGuirk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Douglas.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.