green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“possess" as used in criminal statutes ordinarily signifies an intentional control of a designated thing accompanied by a knowledge of its character”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dawkins v. State
possess" as used in criminal statutes ordinarily signifies an intentional control of a designated thing accompanied by a knowledge of its character
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Cir. 2006).7 While these decisions have some force, each relies either directly or indirectly on Banco Nacional, which the Supreme Court first summarily reversed, see 400 U.S. at 1019, and then reversed in a reasoned opinion that did not reach the merits of the Second Hickenlooper Amendment issue, Banco Nacional IV, 406 U.S. at 770 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Winfrey
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 531-32 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970) (needle marks on defendant’s arm evidence that he, rather than wife or houseguest, owned heroin found in bedroom), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Alfonso
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 532 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense
(2×)
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First Nat'l City Bank, 431 F.2d 394, 399-402 (2d Cir.1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), aff'd on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir.1971), rev'd on other grounds, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972); Compania de Gas de Nuevo Laredo, S.A. v. Entex, 686 F.2d 322, 327 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) (relying solely on Banco Nacional de Cuba).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Peary
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 , cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schoenbneelt
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 531 , 271 A.2d 74 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Maltina Corporation and Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Company, Inc.
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, S.D.N.Y.1967, 270 F.Supp. 1004 , rev’d, 2 Cir. 1970, 431 F. 2d 394 , remanded for further consideration, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2nd Cir. 1970), vacated, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971). 35 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hernandez
State v. Richardson, [supra, 204 Conn. 663 ]; see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kiser
However, ‘[m]ere speculation that the informant’s information will be helpful to the defense is not sufficient to mandate disclosure . . . .’ State v. Richardson, [supra, 204 Conn. 663 ]; see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jackson
State v. Richardson, 204 Conn. 654, 663 , 529 A.2d 1236 (1987); see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba v. First National City Bank
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev'd, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff'd, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d, 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 , on remand, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Nacional De Cuba, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de *878 Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The First National Bank of Boston (International) v. Banco Nacional De Cuba
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973) (“Banco I”); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff'd, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d, 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff’d, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand, sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Connecticut
v.
Connecticut
No. 6069.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1971.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
Sup. Ct. Conn. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.