green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
"special weight"
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jose Berrios Rivera, Etc. v. British Ropes, Ltd. v. Harnischfeger Corporation, and Third-Party v. Levitt & Sons of Puerto Rico, Inc., Third-Party v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Additional Third-Party Jose Berrios Rivera, Etc. v. British Ropes, Ltd. v. Harnischfeger Corporation, and Third-Party v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Additional Third-Party
See, also, Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co., 350 U.S. 198, 204-05 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 (1956) (decision of local federal judge on question of local law to be given special weight); accord, Sauerhoff v. Hearst Corp., 538 F.2d 588, 591 (4th Cir. 1976); Lomartira v. American Automobile Insurance Co., 371 F.2d 550, 554 (2d Cir. 1967); but see, Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015, 1019-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973) (although special weight given, circuit court is not bound).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivera v. British Ropes, Ltd.
See, also, Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co., 350 U.S. 198, 204-05 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 (1956) (decision of local federal judge on question of local law to be given special weight); accord, Sauerhoff v. Hearst Corp., 538 F.2d 588, 591 (4th Cir. 1976); Lomartira v. American Automobile Insurance Co., 371 F.2d 550, 554 (2d Cir. 1967); but see, Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015, 1019-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973) (although special weight given, circuit court is not bound).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Robert Robie
See United States v. Galardi 476 F.2d 1072, 1078 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 , and cert. denied, 414 U.S. 839 , 94 S.Ct. 90 , 38 L.Ed.2d 75 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tompkins v. Port of New York Authority
Grubart, Inc. v Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 US —, 115 S Ct 1043 ) or on the terms of the Jones Act (46 USC, Appendix § 688; see, Powers v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 477 F2d 643, 648, cert denied 414 US 856 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vandiver Food Stores, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
See Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015, 1021 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973). 27 Moreover, this type of injury cannot be attributed to a corporation.
cited
Cited "see"
Rocco P. Digiovanni, Jr. v. Traylor Brothers, Inc.
See Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 477 F.2d 643, 648 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddie Lee Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc., (Two Cases). Charles Taylor, Cross-Appellant v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Cross-Appellee. Charles Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross and Milky Way Barge Line Corporation, Defendant-Cross Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Employers Reinsurance Corporation, and Land & Offshore Services, Inc., U.S. Fire Insurance Company, and North River Insurance Company, Third Party Cross-Appellee v. Continental Underwriters, Ltd., Third Party Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross and Horace Herrin and Horace Herrin Agency, Third Party v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Third Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross Elizabeth Daniels, Etc. v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross and Milky Way Barge Line Corp., Defendant-Cross-Appellee v. Employers Reinsurance Corporation and American Fidelity Insurance Company, and Continental Underwriters, Ltd., Defendant-Third Party Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross and Horace Herrin, Third Party Bossier Bank & Trust Company v. American Fidelity Insurance Company
See Young v. Clear Lake Yacht Basin, Inc., 337 F.Supp 1305, 1315 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff'd, 473 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Dowling v. Mutual Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Milky Way Barge, Inc.
See Young v. Clear Lake Yacht Basin, Inc., 337 F.Supp 1305,1315.(S.D.Tex.1972), aff'd, 473 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Dowling v. Mutual Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
See Rosenthal v. Warren, 475 F.2d 438, 442 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Fox v. Peck Iron & Metal Co., Inc., 25 B.R. 674, 684-87 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Cal.1982), Tooker v. Lopez, 24 N.Y.2d 569, 574 , 301 N.Y.S.2d 519, 523 , 249 N.E.2d 394, 397 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haydu v. Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute
See Rosenthal v. Warren, 475 F.2d 438, 442 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) citing Tooker v. Lopez, 24 N.Y.2d 569 , 301 N.Y.S.2d 519 , 249 N.E.2d 394 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Finnan v. Johnson
See Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. (8th Cir. 1973), 476 F.2d 1015, 1018 , cert. denied (1973), 414 U.S. 856 , 38 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Minns v. Paul
See United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Minns v. Paul
See United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Consiglio
See United States v. Rothberg, 480 F.2d 534 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); United States v. Mann, 451 F.2d 346 (2d Cir. 1971); cf. United States v. Doyle, 348 F.2d 715, 719 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 843 , 86 S.Ct. 89 , 15 L.Ed.2d 84 (1965). 7 Indeed, in the instant case a Second Circuit panel in a summary affirmance passed upon the merits of the issues reserved by the defendants and argued on appeal. 8 One question raised by the instant motion is whether the reservation of the right to appeal an issue also preserves for the petitioners the…
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Kukuruza v. General Electric Company
See Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 477 F.2d 643, 649 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Barrett v. Foster Grant Co., supra; Gobern v. Metals & Controls, Inc., supra. These cases clearly demonstrate that the charge impermissibly broadened defendant’s duty.
discussed
Cited "see"
Husserl v. Swiss Air Transport Company, Ltd.
See Rosenthal v. Warren, 342 F.Supp. 246 (S.D.N.Y.1972), aff’d, 475 F.2d 438 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N.Y.2d 473 , 240 N.Y.S.2d 743 , 191 N.E.2d 279 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
William E. Bennett v. Perini Corporation
See Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 477 F.2d 633, 648 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Provident Life Insurance Company Et Al.
See Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015 , 1019 n. 6 (8th Cir. 1972) (original panel opinion), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Reserve Life Insurance v. Provident Life Insurance
See Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015 , 1019 n. 6 (8th Cir. 1972) (original panel opinion), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Branch Holding Co. v. Trans Marketing Houston, Inc.
App.), writ of error refused N.R.E. (1987); see also Young v. Clear Lake Yacht Basin, Inc., 337 F.Supp. 1305, 1317 (S.D.Texas 1972) aff'd, 473 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nevader v. Deyo
Quebec’s interest in this litigation is minimal at best while New York’s interest is exceedingly strong (NY Const, art I, § 16; see also, Rosenthal v Warren, 475 F2d 438, 443, cert denied 414 US 856 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Natalie C. Hockett v. Richard D. Larson and Mary J. Larson, Lauren F. Cory and Letitia J. Cory, and the Federal Land Bank of Omaha, a Corporation
See, e.g., Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015 , 1019-20 & n. 6 (8th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morgan v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Voccio and Domenic Voccio v. Reliance Insurance Companies, Anthony Voccio and Domenic Voccio v. Reliance Insurance Companies
See, e.g., Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 476 F.2d 1015 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 158 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); Peterson v. Allcity Insurance Co., 472 F.2d 71 (2d Cir.1972); Herges v. Western Casualty and Surety Co., 408 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir.1969); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brewer, 406 F.2d 610 (9th Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.
See, e. g., Rosenthal v. Warren, 475 F.2d 438, 440-46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John McClean
See, e. g., United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 157 , 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973); Culp v. United States, 131 F.2d 93, 98 (8th Cir. 1942). 5 Single Versus Multiple Conspiracies Appellants’ next contention is that the “evidence negates the single-conspiracy theory and shows instead ‘a series of independent discrete agreements.’ ” We disagree.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Case & Company, Inc. v. The Board Of Trade Of The City Of Chicago
The persuasiveness of an administrative interpretation "will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control." Skidmore v. Swift & Co., supra, 323 U.S. at 140 , 65 S.Ct. at 164 ; see also Brennan v. Great American Discount & Credit Co., 477 F.2d 292, 297 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Case & Co. v. Board of Trade
The persuasiveness of an administrative interpretation “will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control.” Skidmore v. Swift & Co., supra, 323 U.S. at 140 , 65 S.Ct. at 164 ; see also Brennan v. Great American Discount & Credit Co., 477 F.2d 292, 297 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 160 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chance v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Inc.
See, e. g., Rosenthal v. Warren, 475 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 856 , 94 S.Ct. 159 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) *445 (in a wrongful death action where a New York resident died eight days after an operation in a Massachusetts hospital, Babcock line applied to determine the applicable law on the issue of limitations on liability).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Senak
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-58.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.