In Re Kauffman Mut. Fund Actions (Joseph B. Kauffman, Petitioner), 414 U.S. 857 (1973). · Go Syfert
In Re Kauffman Mut. Fund Actions (Joseph B. Kauffman, Petitioner), 414 U.S. 857 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
232 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 64 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCabe v. Foley (flmd, 2006-03-06) · Strongest negative: Zambrana v. United States (innd, 1992-04-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Zambrana v. United States
N.D. Ind. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, United States v. Hunter, 478 F.2d 1019, 1024-26 (7th Cir.) (Stevens, J.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973) (implicitly rejected in Iannelli dicta).
cited Cited "see" McCabe v. Foley
M.D. Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 264 (1st Cm.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Preston Proctor v. Millar Elevator Service Company
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lohman v. General American Life Insurance Company, 478 F.2d 719, 722 (8th Cir.) (court of appeals concluded that district court had “otherwise specified” by stating in its order that dismissal was for failure to comply with order to compel answers to interrogatories), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169, 175 (7th Cir.) (because the grounds for dismissal specified in the district court’s order did not “involve the merits of the case, the dismissal order does not operate as an adjudication upon the merits.”), cert. denied…
cited Cited "see" Ana Josefina Gonzalez Turul v. Rogatol Distributors, Inc., Belisario Araujo and Guillermo Araujo
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Heidi D. Mattson v. Brown University, Etc.
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, e.g., Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 896 F.2d 750 , 769 n. 29 (3rd Cir.1990); Richmond v. Madison Management Group, Inc., 918 F.2d 438 , 454 (4th Cir.1990); Industrial Dev.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Cortina
N.D. Ill. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hunter, 478 F.2d 1019, 1022 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited Cited "see" In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation
E.D. Mich. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Lewis v. Graves, 701 F.2d at 248 .
cited Cited "see" Allison Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
D. Del. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Smachlo v. Birkelo
D. Del. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Therefore, the corporate management must be given the first opportunity to institute the litigation since, “[a]s a general principle, the responsibility for determining whether or not a corporation shall enforce in the courts a cause of action for damages is, like other business questions, ordinarily a matter of internal management left to the discretion of the directors.” Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Company, 486 F.2d 139, 146 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974); see In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert.…
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. Curtis
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 , 263 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. Curtis
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 , 263 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited Cited "see" H. M. Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corporation, Etc.
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 264 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Rose Hall, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.
D. Del. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U.S. 450, 461 , 26 L.Ed. 827 (1881); Ainscow v. Sanitary Co. of America, 21 Del.Ch. 35, 36-37 , 180 A. 614 (Ch.1935); see In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
discussed Cited "see" Mid-America Food Service, Inc. v. Ara Services, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115 , 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Marx & Co., Inc. v. Diner’s Club, Inc., 400 F.Supp. 581, 585 (S.D.N.Y.1975), modified on other grounds, 550 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Shlensky v. Dorsey
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973). 47 The plaintiffs argue that Rule 23.1 is intended to benefit the corporation and its directors only and that, therefore, Price Waterhouse lacks standing to raise the defense of noncompliance with the Rule, particularly since counsel representing Gulf and several of its directors waived the right of those defendants to assert a defense based upon the rule.
cited Cited "see" Shlensky v. Dorsey
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors
S.D.N.Y. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115,123 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Shemtob v. Shearson Hammill & Co., supra at 445.
discussed Cited "see" The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
Wright & A. Miller, Supra, at 639-40; See Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 2 Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 115 , Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 ; Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co., 1 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 213, 215 , Cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 ; Hasselbrink v. Speelman, 6 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 34, 39 ; Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc., 2 Cir. 1942, 129 F.2d 904 . 47 The purpose of Rule 51 is to "prevent unnecessary new trials because of errors the judge might have corrected if they had been brought to his attention at the proper time".
discussed Cited "see" Industrial Development Board v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
Wright & A. Miller, supra, at 639-40; see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 2 Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 115 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 ; Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co., 1 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 213, 215 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 ; Hasselbrink v. Speelman, 6 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 34, 39 ; Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc., 2 Cir. 1942, 129 F.2d 904 .
cited Cited "see" Marx & Co., Inc. v. DINERS'CLUB, INC.
S.D.N.Y. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
Jennings v. Boenning & Co., 388 F.Supp. 1294, 1303-04 (E.D.Pa.1975); see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" City of Des Moines v. Huff (2×)
Iowa · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Buttolph, 204 N.W.2d 824, 825 (Iowa 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 163 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 .
cited Cited "see" Ireland v. Wynkoop
Colo. Ct. App. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 ; Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co., supra .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Marrifield
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
Furthermore, it is also clear that 'convictions under 1955 do not require a showing in each individual case that the gambling activities of a particular defendant have affected commerce . . ..' Schneider v. United States, 459 F.2d 540, 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 877 , 93 S.Ct. 129 , 34 L.Ed.2d 131 (1972), quoted in United States v. Meese, 479 F.2d 41 (8th Cir. 1973); see United States v. Hunter, 478 F.2d 1019 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973). 8 In addition to asserted infirmities in the indictment and the trial court's charge to the jury…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Marrifield
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
Furthermore, it is also clear that “[c]onvictions under § 1955 do not require a showing in each individual case that the gambling activities of a particular defendant have affected commerce . . . . ” Schneider v. United States, 459 F.2d 540, 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 877 , 93 S.Ct. 129 , 34 L.Ed.2d 131 (1972), quoted in United States v. Meese, 479 F.2d 41 (8th Cir. 1973); see United States v. Hunter, 478 F.2d 1019 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gus Sclafani and Ben Ross
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115 , 125 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 857 (1973); United States v. Mosca, supra, 475 F.2d at 1058 ; United States v. McCarthy, 473 F.2d 300, 308 (2 Cir. 1972); United States v. Ellis, 461 F.2d 962, 970 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 866 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Sapient Corporation Derivative Litigation
D. Mass. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Shlensky v. Dorsey, 574 F.2d 131, 142 (3d Cir.1978) ("To hold that demands to satisfy Rule 23.1 may be made on the directors after a derivative suit has been initiated would be to reduce the demand requirement of the rule to a meaningless formality.”) (citing In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973)). 34 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oye ex rel. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Swartz
E.D.N.Y · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506, 509 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681, 685 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Symbol Technologies Securities Litigation
E.D.N.Y · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 , 509 *515 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681, 685 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wilmington Trust Co. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Superior Pine Products Co. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 455 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 (1973); Boeing v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 9 , 98 F. Supp. 581 (1951); Dyal v. United States, 342 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1965); Estate of Lawton v. Commissioner, 33 T.C. 47 (1959).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Oldfield v. Alston
N.D. Ga. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weston Funding Corp. v. Lafayette Towers, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 267 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 (1973); Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199, 203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 (1968). 7 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Abbe v. Goss
S.D.N.Y. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 518 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1975) with In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp.
D. Maryland · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 734-35 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968), with, e.g., Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115, 123 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). 22 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Casimir Staszcuk (2×)
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Hunter, 478 F.2d 1019, 1020-1021 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 162 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 . .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Tasner v. Billera
N.D. Ill. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Action, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Robison v. Caster, 356 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1966).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Abrams v. Mayflower Investors, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S. Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Robison v. Caster, 356 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions (Joseph B. Kauffman, Petitioner)
73-99.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 857
Published

414 U.S. 857

IN RE KAUFFMAN MUTUAL FUND ACTIONS (JOSEPH B. KAUFFMAN, PETITIONER).

No. 73-99.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 9, 1973.

1

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 479 F.2d 257.