Minnesota Civil Liberties Union v. Casmey, 433 U.S. 903 (1977). · Go Syfert
Minnesota Civil Liberties Union v. Casmey, 433 U.S. 903 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School Co (ca7, 2023-04-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" John Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School Co
7th Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cummins v. Parker Seal Co., 516 F.2d 544 (6th Cir. 1975), vacated by Par- ker Seal Co. v. Cummins, 433 U.S. 903 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cummins v. Parker Seal Company, 516 F.2d 544, 551-554 (6th Cir. 1975), affirmed by an equally divided court, 429 U.S. 65 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 223 , vacated and remanded on another ground, 433 U.S. 903 . 13 Accordingly, the district court correctly adopted the holding in Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 476 F.Supp. 1027, 1030 (D.Ore.1979), that Section 701(j) "promotes the free exercise of religion without violating the Establishment Clause." 34 V.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cummins v. Parker Seal Company, 516 F.2d 544, 551-554 (6th Cir. 1975), affirmed by an equally divided court, 429 U.S. 65 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 223 , vacated and remanded on another ground, 433 U.S. 903 . 13 Accordingly, the district court correctly adopted the holding in Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 476 F.Supp. 1027, 1030 (D.Ore.1979), that Section 701(j) “promotes the free exercise of religion without violating the Establishment Clause.” V.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Minnesota Civil Liberties Union
v.
Casmey, Commissioner of Education
No. 76-1144.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1977.
433 U.S. 903
Published

Appeal from D. C. Minn. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Wolman v. Walter, ante, p. 229.