green
Positive treatment
published
1.5 score
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to any conversation intercepted during that tap is not an ‘aggrieved person’ and may not move to suppress information derived from it”
- United States v. Benjamin, 72 F. Supp. 2d 161 (W.D.N.Y. 1999).published“a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to any conversation intercepted during that tap is not an ‘aggrieved person’ and may not move to suppress information derived from it”
- United States v. Kaczowski, 114 F. Supp. 2d 143 (W.D.N.Y. 1999).published“a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to any conversation intercepted during that tap is not an “aggrieved person” and may not move to suppress information derived from it.”
- United States v. Funderburk, 492 F. Supp. 2d 223 (W.D.N.Y. 2007).published“a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to a conversation intercepted during that tap is not an ‘aggrieved person’ and may not move to suppress information derived from it.”
- United States v. Mullen, 451 F. Supp. 2d 509 (W.D.N.Y. 2006).published“a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to a conversation intercepted during that tap is not an ‘aggrieved person’ and may not move to suppress information derived from it.”
Other citing cases
- United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990).published
- United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990).published
- Lula Belle Hull, of the Est. of R.D. Hull, Deceased, M.H. Parry, & H.A. Binford v. Brunswick Corp., 704 F.2d 1195 (10th Cir. 1983).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.
v.
Universal Textured Yarns, Inc.
v.
Universal Textured Yarns, Inc.
76-1531.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Published opinion
433 U.S. 910
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (4)
LEX TEX LTD., INC.
v.
UNIVERSAL TEXTURED YARNS, INC., ET AL.
No. 76-1531.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 27, 1997.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 514 F.2d 1127.