green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1979 ·
…where property is validly held by law enforcement officers for which they may have responsibility, it seems a useless gesture, whether it be an automobile or a suitcase, to require a search warrant to effect an inventory of the property.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States of America Ex Rel. James Barksdale v. Allyn R. Sielaff, Director Illinois Department of Corrections, Respondent
But see O'Berry v. Wainwright, 546 F.2d 1204, 1213 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2981 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Trice v. United States
(2×)
only by inference can the existence of intent - or the differentiation between its forms, such as general or specific - be determined
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. George Ochs
(2×)
where property is validly held by law enforcement officers for which they may have responsibility, it seems a useless gesture, whether it be an automobile or a suitcase, to require a search warrant to effect an inventory of the property.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Harkness
See Bethea v. United States, 365 A.2d 64 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Diaz
The defendant’s acknowledgement that he sprayed the victim in the face with mace refutes his claim that he did not in any way aid in the commission of the homicide (Penal Law § 125.25 [3] [a]; see, People v Kampshoff, 53 AD2d 325 , cert denied 433 US 911 ; People v Heyward, 111 AD2d 420 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Melton
See Super.Ct.Civ.R. 50. [25] We agree with amicus that the panel majority's second prong would unnecessarily tax the finite resources of court and counsel by requiring extensive collateral inquiries into the character of the expert's sources, and would constitute an "unwarranted intrusion on the jury's authority to determine the proper weight to be accorded the testimony proffered by the parties." Bethea v. United States, 365 A.2d 64 , 81 n. 36 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977). [26] See Jenkins, supra, 113 U.S.App.D.C. at 304, 307 F.2d at 641 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino
See United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); see also United States v. Giordano, 416 U.S. 505, 527 , 94 S.Ct. 1820, 1832 , 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974) (indicating that suppression of evidence would be justified only if electronic surveillance violation contravened “those statutory requirements that directly and substantially implement the congressional intention to limit the use of intercept procedures to those situations clearly calling for the employment of this extraordinary investigative device”); cf. U…
discussed
Cited "see"
Leo Fuller v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles
(2×)
See Cruz v. Skelton, 543 F.2d 86 , 87 n. 1 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2980 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marion Van Horn, Scott Bertelsen, Gary Balough, Dennis Kay, Robert Van Horn, Dennis Cason, Thomas Sikes, John Crosby Bertelsen, Joseph William Campbell, United States of America v. William Joseph Harvey, A/K/A Billy
See United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977). 6 29 The appellants also claim that the omission of page 21C was a constitutional violation, requiring dismissal under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2684-85 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Horn
See United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977). 6 The appellants also claim that the omission of page 21C was a constitutional violation, requiring dismissal under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2684-85 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Tripp
See United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Villano, 529 F.2d 1046,1056 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 3180 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1976); Hawes, 529 F.2d at 477 ; United States v. Wolk, 466 F.2d 1143, 1146 n. 2 (8th Cir.1972); Schneider v. United States, 459 F.2d 540, 542-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 877 , 93 S.Ct. 129 , 34 L.Ed.2d 131 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
(2×)
See Keener v. State, 238 Ga. 7 ( 230 SE2d 846 ) (1976), cert. den. 433 U. S. 911 (1977); State v. Estevez, 232 Ga. 316 ( 206 SE2d 475 ) (1974); and Harris v. State, 193 Ga. 109 ( 17 SE2d 573 ) (1941), for the distinctions between procedural and substantive double jeopardy.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Appearance of Patrick J. O'Brien Before the Special Federal Grand Jury. Appeal of Patrick J. O'Brien
See United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Echols v. State
See generally Keener v. State, 238 Ga. 7 ( 230 SE2d 846 ) (1976), cert. den., Keener v. Georgia, 433 U. S. 911 (97 SC 2980, 53 LE2d 1096) (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillery v. United States
See generally Bethea v. United States, D.C.App., 365 A.2d 64 (1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); Durham v. United States, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 214 F.2d 862 (1954). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack Thompson v. Ray D. Bass, Etc., Dan H. Turner, Etc.
Accord, Cruz v. Skelton, 543 F.2d 86, 88 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2980 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977); Cook & Nichol, Inc. v. Plimsoll Club, 451 F.2d 505, 506-07 (5th Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick Garrison Williams v. Bruce Brown, Warden
See generally, O’Berry v. Wainwright, 546 F.2d 1204, 1209-14 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2981 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of CWM
See Bethea v. United States, D.C.App., 365 A.2d 64, 87-95 (1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In re C. W. M.
See Bethea v. United States, D.C.App., 365 A.2d 64, 87-95 (1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. United States
See generally Bethea v. United States, D.C.App., 365 A.2d 64 , 92 & n.62 (1976) (considering the propriety of the 1970 amendments), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Ecker, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 31, 47-52 , 543 F.2d 178, 194-99 (1976) (same), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1063 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert v. United States
D.C.Code 1973, § 24-301(j); see Bethea v. United States, D.C.App., 365 A.2d 64 (1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender Rehabilitation
See Cruz v. Skelton, 5 Cir., 1976, 543 F.2d 86 , 89, cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2980 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977); Brown v. Lundgren, 5 Cir., 528 F.2d 1050, 1052-53 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 917 , 97 S.Ct. 308 , 50 L.Ed.2d 283 (1976); Hoffa v. Saxbe, D.D.C., 1974, 378 F.Supp. 1221, 1245 .
examined
Cited "see"
Arthur Richard Gates v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
(4×)
See O'Berry v. Wainwright, 546 F.2d 1204, 1219-24 (5th Cir.) (Goldberg, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2981 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Handy
Id. at 377 ; see also Bethea v. United States, 365 A. 2d 64 , 94 n. 67 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 1095 (1977). [15] *1161 Hence, Khan departed from the procedures of the District of Columbia by directing that issues of insanity and self-defense be bifurcated at trial, with the insanity issue tried first.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Checoura
See United States v. Currens, 290 F.2d 751, 774-75 (3d Cir.1961); see also Bethea v. United States, 365 A.2d 64 , 81 n. 37 (D.C.1976) (explaining Currens standard as requiring only “a demonstrable relationship between the mental disease or defect and the condemned behavior”), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); cf. United States v. Austin, 533 F.2d 879, 888-89 (3d Cir.1976) (Adams, J., dissenting) (arguing that erroneous instruction was not harmless when it could have permitted jury to conclude that defendant was not legally insane, even though his decision…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCall v. Dallas Independent School District
Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana, 238 F.3d 382, 387-88 (5th Cir.2001); see also Cruz v. Skelton, 543 F.2d 86, 91 (5th Cir.1976) (conclusory statement without more “is mere speculation, totally unsupported by factual averments, and is hence insufficient to support a § 1983 complaint”), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2980 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32, 34 (5th Cir.1974) (“Without some factual foundation, Cook’s assertion of arbitrary and capricious action is not sufficient in and of itself to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Moss
There was not such a substantial difference in the quantity and quality of the evidence which the prosecution presented with respect to the defendant and the codefendants as to require a separate trial in the proper administration of justice (see, People v Larkin, 135 AD2d 834 ; People v Griffin, 135 AD2d 730 ; see also, People v Kampshoff, 53 AD2d 325, 337-338 , cert denied 433 US 911 ; cf., People v Pilon, 30 AD2d 365, 367-368 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Valdez-Pacheco
See, e.g., United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. *791 2979, 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Gambale, 610 F.Supp. 1515, 1537 (D.Mass.1985); United States v. Orozco, 630 F.Supp. 1418, 1518 , (S.D.Cal.1986); United States v. Van Horn, 789 F.2d 1492, 1500 (11th Cir.1986); United States v. Sullivan, 586 F.Supp. 1314, 1320-23 (D.Mass.1984); United States v. Harvey, 560 F.Supp. 1040, 1070-72 (S.D.Fla.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambale
See, e.g., United States v. Abramson, 553 F.2d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Sullivan, 586 F.Supp. 1314, 1320-23 (D.Mass.1984); United States v. Harvey, 560 F.Supp. 1040, 1070-72 (S.D.Fla.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. United States
See, e.g., Bethea v. United States, 365 A.2d 64, 80-81 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2979 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abramson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-1672.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1977.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · District of Columbia Court of … (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.