green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
“corporate officer who has contact with a forum state only with regard to the performance of his official duties is not subject to personal jurisdiction in that forum.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Artas Film & Tv Productions Gmbh v. W. Roger Shepherd, and Harvey Goldsmith Harvey Goldsmith Entertainments Ltd.
corporate officer who has contact with a forum state only with regard to the performance of his official duties is not subject to personal jurisdiction in that forum.
cited
Cited "see"
Staffing Network, Inc. v. Pietropaolo
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 783-84 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 (1978); Ameritrust Co. Nat.
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Brady & Co. v. Eno
See McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978); Russ v. Ratliff, 538 F.2d 799, 804 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 740 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Brady & Company, Incorporated, a Missouri Corporation v. Rex Eno, an Individual and Resident of Iowa Aegon U.S.A. (Life Investors, Inc.), an Iowa Corporation, Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Donald J. Shepard, an Individual and a Resident of Iowa David Soelter, an Individual and a Resident of Texas, James E. Brady, Jr., James E. Brady & Company, Incorporated, a Missouri Corporation v. Rex Eno, an Individual and Resident of Iowa Aegon U.S.A. (Life Investors, Inc.), an Iowa Corporation, Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Donald J. Shepard, an Individual and a Resident of Iowa David Soelter, an Individual and a Resident of Texas, James E. Brady, Jr.
See McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978); Russ v. Ratliff, 538 F.2d 799, 804 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 740 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Coca Cola Bottling Company of Buffalo, Inc.
See NLRB v. Solboro Knitting Mills Inc., 572 F.2d 936, 944 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 781 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Fuchs Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Jet Spray Corp.
See N.L.R.B. v. Solboro Knitting Mills, Inc., 572 F.2d 936, 942 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
O'NEAL v. Huxley Development Corp.
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 781 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Simpson v. Thiele, Inc., 344 F.Supp. 7, 8 (D.Del.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bamford v. Hobbs
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 783 (9th Cir.) cert. denied 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc., 519 F.2d 634, 637 (8th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mizell v. United States
See McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978). 27 It is undisputed that the objective of the residency program was to obtain increased competence, ability, and training in the various specialized areas of medicine.
cited
Cited "see"
Mizell v. United States
See McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Insurance Company Of North America v. Marina Salina Cruz
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978). 7 An assertion of in personam jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant does not violate due process if the defendant has "certain minimum contacts with (the forum state) such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.' " International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 , 66 S.Ct. 154, 158 , 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945) (International Shoe), quoting Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 , 61 S.Ct. 339, 342 , 85 …
cited
Cited "see"
Insurance Co. of North America v. Marina Salina Cruz
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyllie Gatewood v. Fiat, S. P. A.
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Arrow Aluminum *823 Castings Co., 510 F.2d 1029, 1031 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Varsic v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Assocs., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1287 (9th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Varsic v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California
See Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Assocs., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1287 (9th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
45 Fair empl.prac.cas. 398, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,927 Elise D. McIntosh Susan C. Sorrells Odessa Hollis Ann E. Kennedy and Joann Scherbring, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Individuals Employed by the United States Army Who Have Been Denied Promotional Opportunities by Reason of Race, Color, National Origin, or Age v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army Edward Turner, Individually and in His Capacity as Assistant Civilian Personnel Officer for Troop Support and Aviation Materiel Readiness Command, Elise D. McIntosh Susan C. Sorrells Odessa Hollis Ann E. Kennedy and Joann Scherbring, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Individuals Employed by the United States Army Who Have Been Denied Promotional Opportunities by Reason of Race, Color, National Origin, or Age v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army Edward Turner, Individually and in His Capacity as Assistant Civilian Personnel Officer for Troop Support and Aviation Materiel Readiness Command
Co., 372 U.S. 108, 119 , 83 S.Ct. 659, 666 , 9 L.Ed.2d 618 (1963); see also McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155, 157 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McIntosh v. Weinberger
Co., 372 U.S. 108, 119 , 83 S.Ct. 659, 666 , 9 L.Ed.2d 618 (1963); see also McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155,157 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albin Laaperi, Administrator of the Estate of Alan Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., Albin Laaperi, Administrator of the Estate of James Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., Albin Laaperi, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., Janet Laaperi, Ppa, by Her Father, Albin Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, 575 F.2d 155 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978) (risk of tipping in specially designed commode chair obvious to paraplegic); Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., 529 F.2d 457 (5th Cir.1976) (dangers of chemical obvious to professional users to whom it is exclusively marketed); Restatement (Second) of Torts Sec. 388 comment k (supplier must warn of product's dangers if there is "no reason to believe that those who will use it will have such special experience as will enable them to perceive the danger").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See, e.g., McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, 575 F.2d 155 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978) (risk of tipping in specially designed commode chair obvious to paraplegic); Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., 529 F.2d 457 (5th Cir.1976) (dangers of chemical obvious to professional users to whom it is exclusively marketed); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388 comment k (supplier must warn of product’s dangers if there is "no reason to believe that those who will use it will have such special experience as will enable them to perceive the danger”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Calder
See also Forsythe v. Overmyer (9th Cir. 1978) 576 F.2d 779, 783-784 , cert, den., 439 U.S. 864 [ 58 L.Ed.2d 174 , 99 S.Ct. 188 ]; Quattrone v. Superior Court, supra, 44 Cal.App.3d 296, 308 .) Defendants’ affidavits in support of their motion to quash service of summons state that defendants, in performing their services relating to the subject article, were acting on behalf of the National Enquirer, Inc., and not in “a personal capacity. ” However, as stated in Donner v. Tams-Witmark Music Library, Inc. (E.D.Pa. 1979) 480 F.Supp. 1229 , 1234: “It would be anomalous, and would defeat th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc.
See also McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 178 (1978) (district court had vacated award of punitive damages where verdict returned in strict liability, Missouri law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation, Warren Vanskike, Lucille Vanskike v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike, Lucille Vanskike v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation
See also McIntyre v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 575 F.2d 155 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 178 (1978) (district court had vacated award of punitive damages where verdict returned in strict liability, Missouri law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kransco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bernhard Markwitz
See also Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Company
(2×)
See, e. g., NLRB v. Solboro Knitting Mills, Inc., 572 F.2d 936, 945-46 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Trico Products Corp. v. NLRB, 489 F.2d 347, 353 (2nd Cir. 1973); NLRB v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 358 F.2d 94, 96 (5th Cir. 1966); Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 690 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) 11 We need not decide whether the holding which is suggested by the panel's reading of the Board's opinion is a permissible interpretation of the Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Company
(2×)
See, e. g., NLRB v. Solboro Knitting Mills, Inc., 572 F.2d 936, 945-46 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978); Trico Products Corp. v. NLRB, 489 F.2d 347, 353 (2nd Cir. 1973); NLRB v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 358 F.2d 94, 96 (5th Cir. 1966); Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 690 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964). 100 The key issue with respect to the aspect of the Board's remedial order which extends to projects not yet begun at the time of the unfair labor practices is whether the Board exceeded its autho…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Adler
See also United States v. Guthartz, 573 F.2d 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 187 , 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978); United States v. Radetsky, 535 F.2d 556, 561-65 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 820 , 97 S.Ct. 68 , 50 L.Ed.2d 81 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roll et ux.
v.
West Side Federal Savings & Loan Association of New York City
v.
West Side Federal Savings & Loan Association of New York City
No. 78-118.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.