green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Ojther crimes evidence is inadmissible to prove intent when that issue is not really in dispute”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael Mohel
ojther crimes evidence is inadmissible to prove intent when that issue is not really in dispute
discussed
Cited "see"
Vigna v. State
See Klauenberg v. State , 355 Md. 528 , 549, 735 A.2d 1061 (1999) ( quoting U.S. v. Cooper , 577 F.2d 1079 (6th Cir.), cert. denied , 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978) ) ("Conceivably within the broad language of the rule is any conduct of the defendant which may bear adversely on the jury's judgment of his character.").
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fuller
Id.; see Rhodes v. Schoen, 574 F.2d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed.2d 178 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kimble v. State
See U.S. v. Cooper (1978), 6th Cir., 577 F.2d 1079 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 ; U.S. v. Senak (1975), 7th Cir., 527 F.2d 129 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 1500 , 47 L.Ed.2d 758 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tony Barber
See United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1088-89 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978). 42 Barber also contends that Rule 404(b) was violated by the admission of certain testimony by Melissa Wells.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerome Susskind (91-1003) James Rumler (91-1004) and Scott Nickerson (91-1005)
(2×)
See United States v. Pope, 574 F.2d 320, 326-27 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 929 , 98 S.Ct. 2828 , 56 L.Ed.2d 774 , 436 U.S. 949 , 98 S.Ct. 2856 , 56 L.Ed.2d 792 , 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978) (holding an unintentional Jeneks error harmless when the trial court had provided the statements to the defendant and recalled the witnesses to cure the error); United States v. Lane, 479 F.2d 1134, 1136 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 78 , 38 L.Ed.2d 112 (1973) (holding there was no Jeneks error due to the government’s failure to turn over rough notes use…
discussed
Cited "see"
Risk v. Kingdom of Norway
See United States v. Arias, 575 F.2d 253 , 254 n. 1 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978). 7 Risk argues that the Norwegian Court testimony should not be admitted as evidence of the truth but as evidence of what Sandvin and Risk's former wife will say at trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan L. Cooper
See United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1089 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978); Turner v. United States, 426 F.2d 480, 483 (6th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 982 (1971). 9 A bill of particulars serves three functions: first, it may inform the defendant of the nature of the charges against him with sufficient precision to facilitate his preparation of an effective defense; second, it may avoid or minimize the dangers of surprise at trial; and third, it may enable the defendant "to plead his acquittal or conviction in bar of another prosecution for the same offense when the i…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
The purpose of the agreement, set put in Article I, is to provide cooperative procedures between party jurisdictions to protect a prisoner’s right to a speedy trial and to remove “uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation.” Id.; See Rhodes v. Schoen, 574 F.2d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 195 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 178 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackie Thomas Norris
See United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1988 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978); United States v. Mahar, 519 F.2d 1272, 1273 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1020 (1975)
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominick Martino
See United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leigh Raymond Tamura
An essential element of the crime of perjury is that the perjurer have “taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person ... that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly.” 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (1976); see United States v. Arias, 575 F.2d 253, 254 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Eufrasia Corona-Palomera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Antonio Corona-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See United States v. Arias, 575 F.2d 253 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Ellison Associates v. Eastwood Management Corp. (In Re Ellison Associates)
See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F.2d 185, 187-188 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 181 , 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Murzyn, A/K/A \Mo Mo\"
See United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1088-89 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. B. H. Webb, A/K/A Hamp Webb
See United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Dreher v. Rana Management, Inc.
See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F.2d 185, 187-88 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 181 , 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Haugen v. United States
See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F.2d 185, 187-88 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 181 , 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Figueroa, Angel Lebron, and Ralph Acosta
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Leo A. Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corporation
See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F.2d 185, 187-88 (2d Cir. 1978), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 181 , 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.
See Gatling v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 577 F.2d 185, 187-88 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 181 , 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Aponte
Compare United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 194 (2d Cir.) (failure to deny involvement in conspiracy constitutes adoptive admission because statement occurred in non-custodial context), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978) with Flecha, 539 F.2d at 876-78 (failure to respond to incriminating statement does not constitute adoptive admission because statement made while under arrest and in presence of customs agent)..
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
See, e.g., United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1082-83 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lavonda Lynn Webster
See also United States v. Pope, 574 F.2d 320, 326 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul W. Woods
United States v. Franklin, 608 F.2d 241, 244 (6th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1085 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Joseph Blay
See Rosenberg v. United States, 360 U.S. 367 (1959) (holding that where the Jencks Act is not complied with at all, a harmless error analysis is applicable); see also United States v. Pope, 574 F.2d 320 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 (1978) (holding that where the prosecutor provides Jencks Act material after the witness has concluded testimony, reversal is required only if the error is not cured). 44 As a result, we hold that the district court acted within its discretion in denying defendant's request for a recess.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Tuan Bustamante
See also United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); United States v. Legget & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 658 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Petrucelli v. Phillip Coombe, Jr., Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); People v. Davis, 57 A.D.2d 1013, 1014 , 394 N.Y.S.2d 486 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dean S. Hazel, (81-1616), James G. Lott, (81-1630)
See also United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1086 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); United States v. Leg-get & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 658 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turnipseed
See, e. g., United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079 , 1085 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); United States v. Kirk, 534 F.2d 1262, 1279 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 564 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976); United States v. Warren, 453 F.2d 738, 745 (2nd Cir. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sayles
v.
Sales
v.
Sales
No. 78-5016.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Ct. App. D. C. Certio-rari denied.