green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Tully v. Mobil Oil Corp.
As the Court of Appeals noted in another context, `[t]his objective is certainly not an exercise of a taxing power but a police power affecting the price structure of petroleum products.' Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, supra, at 918.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Alaska
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 916-17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dubno, 639 F.2d 919, 921 (2d Cir), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3122 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981). 3 Consequently, we decline to consider that issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dept. of Public Utility Control
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dubno, 492 F.Supp. 1004, 1013 (D.Conn. 1980), aff'd in part & appeal dismissed in part, 639 F.2d 919 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3122 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981) (“Dubno ”); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 499 F.Supp. 888, 895 (N.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd in part & appeal dismissed in part, 639 F.2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hiegel v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
See International Union of Electrical Workers v. Westinghouse, 631 F.2d 1094 (3rd Cir. 1980), cert. *217 denied, 452 U.S. 967 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Home of Economy, Inc.
See International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 631 F.2d 1094,1101 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981); General Electric Co. v. Southern Construction Co., 383 F.2d 135 , 138 n. 4 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 955 , 88 S.Ct. 1049 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1968).
examined
Cited "see"
Scallop Corporation v. Tully
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Whelan v. Brinegar, 538 F.2d 924, 926 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); M.
examined
Cited "see"
Scallop Corp. v. Tully
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Whelan v. Brinegar, 538 F.2d 924, 926 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Prairie Producing Co., Inc.
(2×)
While it has been held that, at least in some circumstances, a gas well is a “mine,” Southland Royalty Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 378 S.W.2d 50, 56 (Tex.1964); see also Amoco Production Co. v. Guild Trust, 636 F.2d 261 (10th Cir.1980) (applying Wyoming law), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981), these cases did not involve the production of sulphur from hydrogen sulfide gas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey & Harvey, Inc. v. Delaware Solid Waste Authority
See also Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tally, 639 F.2d 912, 917-18 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981) (Tax Injunction Act did not prohibit entertaining suit attacking anti-passthrough provision of statute imposing 2% tax on gross receipts of oil companies doing business in New York since the provision was not an exercise of the state’s taxing powers to assess, levy, or collect taxes but rather an exercise of the state’s police powers to control prices); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dubno, 639 F.2d 919, 922 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 312…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dottie D. Jernigan Bryant and Theresa O. Lillibridge, in No. 81-1558 v. International Schools Services, Inc., in No. 81-1559
(2×)
See also, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, et al. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 631 F.2d 1094 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3121 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guild Trust
v.
Amoco Production Co.
v.
Amoco Production Co.
No. 80-1928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.