green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Lintzenich v. United States
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blair v. State
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1083 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (affirming trial court's acceptance of defense counsel's assurances that defendant wished to waive jury trial after lengthy consultation); United States v. Agee, 83 F.3d 882 , 886 n. 5 (7th Cir.1996) (explaining when "there is a direct and specific discussion between defense counsel and the trial court regarding the waiver, the court can make the inquiries necessary to be confident that the defendant *1218 understood the right he or she was waiving and willingly r…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maxey & Co., Pc
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 535-37 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (holding that Government need only present affidavit of agent involved in investigation to satisfy prima facie case); see also, Conner v. United States, 947 F.Supp. 1267, 1270 (N.D.Ind.1996) (Judge Lee addressing merits of IRS summons under 26 U.S.C. § 7609 (b)).
cited
Cited "see"
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See id. (citing United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knipe v. Skinner
See In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299, 303-06 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 689 F.2d 379, 381-82 (2d Cir.1982) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knipe v. Skinner
See In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299 , 303-06 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 689 F.2d 379, 381-82 (2d Cir.1982) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Board of Education
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 422 F.Supp. 708 , (N.D.Ohio 1976), modified, 607 F.2d 714 (1979) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Columbus Board of Ed. v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 , 99 S.Ct. 2971 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Bronson v. Bd. of Ed. of Cincinnati, 604 F.Supp. 68 (S.D.Ohio 1948). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Warner Bros. Inc., J. Joseph Bainton, Esquire v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc., and Yun Yon Cho
See In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299, 305-06 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 605 F.2d 35, 40-41 (2d Cir.1978); Der-Rong Chour v. INS, 578 F.2d 464, 467 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 980 , 99 S.Ct. 1786 , 60 L.Ed.2d 239 (1979); Ruderer v. Fines, 614 F.2d 1128, 1132-34 (7th Cir.1980); Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 115 F.R.D. 292 (S.D.N.Y.1987); 28 U.S.C. §§ 1912 , 1927; Fed.R.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip George Stuart, Sr. v. United States of America, Mons Kapoor v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 535-36 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
S. Thomas Burnett v. Thomas R. Kindt
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 534 (7th Cir.1981) (“a contempt citation may ... be the only means of gaining review when a question would otherwise become moot”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc., and Robert L. Wenz & Merrick Consultants, Ltd., Intervening
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 16 The phone calls to the merchants hurt Drinkwine but were in the merchants' interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolphin Tours, Inc. v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1261-62 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (where plaintiff had to make fourteen percent market share to *1511 make a profit, failure to account for defendant’s “competitive reaction” in estimating market share was a causation issue because plaintiff could not establish any injury without establishing that it would have achieved the fourteen percent market share).
cited
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Gluck and Ina Gluck v. United States of America, Sidney Stein Stein & Stein Stein's Foot Specialties, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Patmon, 630 F.2d 458, 459 (6th Cir.1980); United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 722 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); United States v. Deak-Perera Banking Corp., 610 F.2d 89 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. First National Bank, 587 F.2d 909, 910 (8th Cir.1978); Barney v. United States, 568 F.2d 116, 117 (8th Cir.1978); Kurshan v. Riley, 484 F.2d 952 (4th Cir. 1973); United States v. L…
discussed
Cited "see"
Freddie D. Gibson, Jr. v. Frank Blackburn, Warden
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1082 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hethcote v. United States
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. First Family Mortgage Corp.
Accord United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (compliance with handwriting exemplars moots appeal). 8 In Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720 , for example, the IRS served summons on Arthur Andersen, as tax advisor, during an IRS investigation of the taxpayer.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. First Family Mortgage Corp.
Accord United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (compliance with handwriting exemplars moots appeal).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher Garrett
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bronson v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF CINCINNATI
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 500 F.Supp. 404 (N.D.Ohio 1980), aff'd, 662 F.2d 1219 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Penick v. Board of Education, 519 F.Supp. 925 (S.D.Ohio 1981), aff'd, 663 F.2d 24 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems, a California Corporation v. North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Philips Business Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and N v. Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken, a Nederland Corporation, North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Counterclaim v. General Business Systems, a California Corporation Shasta General Systems, a California Corporation, Counterclaim
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 64 The relationship between GBS and Shasta does not fall clearly at either of these extremes.
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems v. North American Philips Corp.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal. 1979), aff’d, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720 , 725 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Marshall, 610 F.2d 1128 (3d Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neshewat v. Salem
See In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F.2d 1254 , 1261 (2d Cir.1984) (noting that injunctive relief is particularly appropriate when the plaintiff appears judgment-proof because sanctions would be ineffective); see also In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F.2d 299, 305 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (“The United States Courts are not powerless to protect the public, including litigants ... from the depredations of those ... who abuse the process of the Courts to harass and annoy others with meritless, frivolous, vexatious or repetitive ... proceedin…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Redden
See also United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1081-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Church of World Peace
As we recognized in Trails End Motel, taxpayers who have complied with a summons “may adequately protect their asserted interest by challenging the IRS procedure if and when the government attempts to make further use of the information obtained by the summonses.” Trails End Motel, 657 F.2d at 1170 ; see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981) (noting the “well-established rule that questions of suppression should not be considered until the time when the Government seeks to use that evidence.”), cert. denied sub nom, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Church Of World Peace
As we recognized in Trails End Motel, taxpayers who have complied with a summons "may adequately protect their asserted interest by challenging the IRS procedure if and when the government attempts to make further use of the information obtained by the summonses." Trails End Motel, 657 F.2d at 1170 ; see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981) (noting the "well-established rule that questions of suppression should not be considered until the time when the Government seeks to use that evidence."), cert. denied sub nom, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarado Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.
See, e.g., Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff 'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Beckwith, 617 F.Supp. at 189.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie X. Ross v. Ralph Kemp
(2×)
See also United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Segmond v. United States
United States v. Garden State Nat'l Bank, 607 F.2d 61, 68 (3d Cir.1979); see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir.1981) (“no more than [an affidavit] is necessary”), cert. denied sub nom Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mutschler & Associates
See, e.g., United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 538 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1037-1038 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668, 674 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John G. Mutschler & Associates, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 538 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1037-1038 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668, 674 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(2×)
See also Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Salkin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.