green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Swanger
But see United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1198-99 (7th Cir.) (Government did not supply contraband child pornography, and therefore no due process violation would be found), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Carter v. State
See Carter v. State, 442 So.2d 150 (Ala.Cr.App.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Krout
See United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto A. Rosales, Sr.
See United States v. Rosales, 978 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1992) where we relied on United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984), and held that because Rosales became a fugitive during trial, he waived the right to contest errors "on appeal. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leo Orlando Muniz
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197-98 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Loren Francis Bellrichard
See United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (5th Cir.1983) (hospital patient’s statement that he would kill the President if released was a true threat), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoine J. Shipp
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197-98 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 (1984). 14 The district court found Shipp's statements to the officers were spontaneously given.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santana
See Valona, 834 F.2d at 1344 -45 (citing United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1199 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984)) (“[T]his court has stated in the past that it will closely examine government conduct when the government supplies the contraband.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pickard
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis A. Kosma
See United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1983) (hospital patient's statement that he would kill the President if released is a true threat), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 965 (11th Cir.) (letter offering to kill the President if Secret Service could make arrangements is a true threat), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Chin
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1199 (7th Cir.) (holding that governmental inducement of criminal activity is unlawful only with respect to defendants who are not predisposed), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. Billman
See United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984) (escape and recapture during trial); United States v. Holmes, 680 F.2d 1372 (11th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 , 103 S.Ct. 1259 , 75 L.Ed.2d 486 (1983) (escape and recapture after finding of guilty and before sentence).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Arvin
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1200 (7th Cir.) cert denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Thomas, 613 F.2d 787, 794 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 245 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); United States v. Cutting, 538 F.2d 835, 840 (9th Cir.1976) (en banc) (“female nudes so posed that a jury could quickly find that the sole purpose was to emphasize a lewd portrayal of the genitals.”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1052 , 97 S.Ct. 766 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977); United States v. Nemuras, 567 F.Supp. 87, 90 (D.Md.1983), aff'd, 740 F.2d 286…
discussed
Cited "see"
Haas v. Abrahamson
See Muench v. Israel, 715 F.2d 1124, 1145 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984) (A state is not constitutionally compelled to recognize the doctrine of diminished capacity and hence a state may exclude expert testimony offered for the purpose of establishing that a criminal defendant lacked the capacity to form a specific intent).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth L. Musslyn
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Goodwin, 854 F.2d 33 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531 (10th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Rust v. Grammer
See Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 594 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Rust v. Grammer
See Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 594 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee R. Johnson
(2×)
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir.1984) cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Kabala, 680 F.Supp. 1254 (N.D.Ill., 1988). 37 Turning to his convictions under 18 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Hugh Nelson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See State v. Meadows, 28 Ohio St.3d 43 , 503 N.E.2d 697 (1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1581 , 94 L.Ed.2d 771 (1987) 2 See, e.g., United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984) 1 Although in P.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ellis v. Jacob
See Muench v. Israel, 715 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); Wahrlich v. Arizona, 479 F.2d 1137 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1011 , 94 S.Ct. 375 , 38 L.Ed.2d 249 (1973); Annotation, Admissibility of Expert Testimony as to Whether Accused Had Specific Intent Necessary for Conviction, 16 A.L.R.4th 666 , § 4 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Anagnos
See United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538, 1539 (11th Cir.) (2-1 decision), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Dwayne Gilbert
See United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1983) (line between protected and unprotected speech may be difficult to draw), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Gabriel and Badie Abdulahad
See United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Kaminski, 703 F.2d 1004, 1008 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. United States
See Parrish, 281 U.S.App.D.C. at 117 , 887 F.2d at 1107 ; see also United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538, 1539 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984). 3 Therefore, we turn to consideration of whether in the exercise of discretion we should consider the merits of the appeal.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mason v. A. Clark
See also Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 596 (8th Cir.1983) (court may refer to unpublished decisions), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mason v. Clark
See also Jones v. Mabry, 723 F.2d 590, 596 (8th Cir.1983) (court may refer to unpublished decisions), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keith M. Jacobson
(2×)
We have carefully considered these contentions and find them without merit. 14 We thus affirm Jacobson's conviction. 15 LAY, Chief Judge, dissenting. 16 In Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 , 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1975), the Supreme Court recognized that "the entrapment defense 'focus[es] on the intent or predisposition of the defendant to commit the crime,' rather than upon the conduct of the Government's agents." Id. at 488 , 96 S.Ct. at 1649 (quoting United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 429 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1641 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973)); see also United States v. Thoma, 72…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Noone
See, e.g., United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258, 1262 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gurican v. State
See, e.g., United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538, 1539 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Holmes, 680 F.2d 1372 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 , 103 S.Ct. 1259 , 75 L.Ed.2d 486 (1983); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvaro Lazcano, A/K/A Jose A. Lazcano
In evaluating the claim, the governing legal principle is clear: Entrapment as a matter of law “only occurs when the absence of defendant’s predisposition appears from the un-contradicted evidence.” United States v. Kaminski, 703 F.2d 1004, 1007 (7th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Navarro, 737 *406 F.2d 625, 635 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Neavill
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Howell, 719 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 965 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Dysart, 705 F.2d 1247, 1256 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marian Fusko
See, e.g., United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Sosa, 379 F.2d 525 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 845 , 88 S.Ct. 94 , 19 L.Ed.2d 111 (1967); United States v. Green, 315 F.2d 289 (7th Cir.1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gantzer
See also United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1197 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984) (wherein the Seventh Circuit enumerated many factors which go into determining predisposition, including “the character or reputation of the defendant”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miller
See also Johnston v. State, 673 P.2d 844 (Okla.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); State v. Carvalho, 122 R.I. 461 , 409 A.2d 132 (1979); State v. Studham, 572 P.2d 700 (Utah 1977); Lhost v. State, 85 Wis.2d 620 , 271 N.W.2d 121 (1978); Evans v. State, 655 P.2d 1214 (Wyo.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 83-6252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1984.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.