green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Battle
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336 (11th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lipin v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF PITTSBURGH
The Appellate Division’s “conduct of disciplinary proceedings with respect to those admitted to practice before it amounts to a judicial inquiry,” Erdmann v. Stevens, 458 F.2d 1205, 1208 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 889 , 93 S.Ct. 126 , 34 L.Ed.2d 147 (1972); see Polur, 1995 WL 232730 , at *4, and it is a well-established principle that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies to reviews of New York State’s disciplinary proceedings against attorneys, see Zimmerman v. Grievance Committee, 726 F.2d 85, 86 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 876 (1984); Sa…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooks
See United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227, 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in denying evidentiary hearing on selective prosecution in absence of prima facie case of selective prosecution). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Upton
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336-37 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984) (I.R.S. fulfills statutory duty by issuing summons prior to establishment of liability); Uhrig v. United States, 592 F.Supp. 349, 353 (D.Md. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sparks
(2×)
See United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 445 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Curran
See United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 450 (5th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 ; Mitchell v. Association of Bar, 40 N.Y.2d 153, 156 , 386 N.Y.S.2d 95, 97 , 351 N.E.2d 743, 745 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abrahams
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227, 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 849-50 (5th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abrahams
See United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 849-50 (5th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Johnson Company, Inc. v. Amir Khimani
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a "present inability to comply that goes 'beyond a mere assertion of inability....' " Combs, 785 F.2d at 984 (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984); see United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Johnson Co. v. Khimani
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a “present inability to comply that goes ‘beyond a mere assertion of inability_’ ” Combs, 785 F.2d at 984 (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984); see United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
The witness who prepared the summary chart explained that payments made to these two doctors were, in effect, payments to DYCC since they provided health care services as independent contractors for DVCC pursuant to DYCC’s contract with the Florida Trust Fund. “[T]he essential requirement is not that the charts be free from reliance on any assumptions, but rather that these assumptions be supported by evidence in the record.” United States v. Diez, 515 F.2d at 905 ; accord United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436, 442 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kornfeld
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a “present inability to comply that goes ‘beyond a mere assertion of inability. . .’” Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 970 , 984 (11th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir. 1984)); see also United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Solow
However, once the moving party makes a prima facie showing that the court order was violated, the burden of production shifts to the alleged contemnor to show a “present inability to comply that goes ‘beyond a mere assertion of inability. " Combs v. Ryan’s Coal Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 970 , 984 (1986) (quoting United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir.1984)); see also United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 337 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Subpoena of Roger Gimbel by Fdic as Receiver for First New York Bank for Business. Roger Gimbel v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334, 336 (11th Cir.1983) (applying Powell standard to IRS summons for personal tax records), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (1984); United States v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 851 (5th Cir.1969) (holding that “we are satisfied that the Commissioner meets the standard of probable cause when he meets the requirements of Powell ”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Babigian v. Association of the Bar
July 11, 1988) ["State Defendants’ Memorandum”]; see also Zimmerman v. Grievance Committee, 726 F.2d 85, 86 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 876 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Babigian v. ASS'N OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NY
July 11, 1988) ["State Defendants' Memorandum"]; see also Zimmerman v. Grievance Committee, 726 F.2d 85, 86 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2681 , 81 L.Ed.2d 876 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. Nashua School District
Sec., 455 U.S. 445, 454 , 102 S.Ct. 1162, 1167 , 71 L.Ed.2d 325 (1982); see also Baird v. Bellotti, 724 F.2d 1032, 1037 (1st Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2680 , 81 L.Ed.2d 875 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baird
v.
Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts
v.
Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts
No. 83-1664.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.